Explain utilizing the moralss of cultural relativism the advantages and disadvantages of whistle blowing Cultural relativism is the rule sing the beliefs. values. and patterns of a civilization from the point of view of that civilization itself ( Chegg. com: 2012 ) . It is the construct that the importance of a peculiar cultural thought varies from one society or social subgroup to another and that ethical and moral criterions are comparative to what a peculiar society or civilization believes to be good or bad. right or incorrect. In other words. “right” and “wrong” are culture-specific ; what is considered moral in one society may be considered immoral in another. and. since no cosmopolitan criterion of morality exists. no 1 has the right to judge another society’s imposts. Harmonizing to Philosophy All About. org ( 2012 ) the position that the varied moral or ethical systems are all every bit valid is based on the thought that there is no ultimate criterion of good or evil ; so every judgement about right and incorrect is a merchandise of society. Therefore. any sentiment on morality or moralss is capable to the cultural position of each individual.
Ultimately. this means that no moral or ethical system can be considered the “best. ” or “worst. ” and no peculiar lesson or ethical place can really be considered “right” or “wrong. ” Cultural position therefore can assist us understand why certain actions are considered right or incorrect by a peculiar civilization. The actions being referred to include the act of whistle blowing. Boatwright ( 2009: 90 ) defines the act whistle blowing as the release of information by a member or former member of an administration that is grounds of illegal and/or immoral behavior in the administration or behavior in the administration that is non in the public involvement.
There's a specialist from your university waiting to help you with that essay.
Tell us what you need to have done now!
order now
Nadler and Schulman ( 2006 ) assert that whistle blowing is elaborately linked to moralss in that it represents a person’s apprehension. at a deep degree. that an action his or her administration is taking is taking is harmful and that it interferes with people’s rights or is unjust or detracts from the common good. The inquiry hence from a cultural relativism position is. through which culture’s lens is the “common good” being viewed. If in the prevalent civilization whistling blowing is a common and acceptable pattern an ambiance where the advantages of whistling blowing has been cultivated.
Harmonizing to Trimborn ( 2012 ) the most of import of the advantages is that whistle-blowing frequently ends long-standing error that would hold otherwise continued. Administrations who encourage a whistle blowing civilization. advance crystalline construction and effectual. clear communicating. More significantly. whistle blowing can protect the organization’s clients. Trimborn ( 2012 ) cites the illustration of a infirmary using a figure of negligent staff members. Other. more ethically inclined. employees would necessitate to convey such issues to the hospital’s attending. protecting the organisation from possible cases or terrible bad lucks ensuing in a patient’s death. In the instance of clear workplace misdemeanors of wellness and safety ordinances. or breach of employment Torahs. workers are protected and their rights upheld. With respect to research or proficient issues. whistle blowers may mention internal memos and other certification to turn out uncertainties existed about a merchandise ( such as a cover-up of certain medicine dangers ) or that false research consequences were wittingly published.
Whistle blowers frequently highlight safety concerns sing autos or other merchandises. therefore protecting an unsuspicious public. Whistle-blowing upholds the jurisprudence. protects many from the impact of wrongdoing. reveals the truth and prevents further error. In civilizations where whistle-blowing is frowned upon lay waste toing effects can be visited upon the whistle blower. Trimborn ( 2012 ) reveals some of whistle blowing’s negative reverberations. First. it can convey expiration of the whistle-blower’s services by the organisation. It would be hard to stay. no affair how justifiable the determination to uncover illegalities and no affair how much the disclosures would really profit others. Second. big-time disclosures could convey down the organisation doing everyone to lose their occupations.
Third. the whistle blower can acquire stigmatized as “disloyal” and be discredited in some manner. Fourthly. the organisation and sometimes co-workers may demand some signifier of retaliation on the whistle blower in requital. Therefore. the whistle blower is someway blamed for the error and fired without an chance for exoneration. In communities. the whistle blower and household may be capable to hostile intervention. viewed as moving out of opportunism with a position to deriving promotion at others’ disbursal.
In decision. unless civilization. pattern and the jurisprudence indicate that it is safe and accepted for whistle blowers to raise a echt concern about corruptness or illegality. workers will presume that they risk exploitation. losing their occupation or damaging their calling. They even risk being cast out or ostracised by the communities they emanate from. In civilizations where a safety cyberspace for whistle blowers exists the whistle blower is marked as a individual of unity who has the anchor to make what is right no affair what. It lets others know the whistle blower can be trusted to cover with others candidly. It besides limits the effects of bullying tactics designed to rock whistle blowers from taking appropriate action where necessary ( Young: 2007 ) .
