The film that I have chosen to watch for this peculiar fillip assignment is called “The Freedom Writers” . The film is about a new instructor and the challenges that she faces in order to do the pupils in her English category. who come from different ethnics backgrounds and who most hate each other. acquire along. And. of class. by the terminal of the film. she is successful in making so.
Racism played a major function in this film. seen as a negative facet in the children’s attitudes and outlooks. Racism is defined as negative behavior on an wrong premise that one race is inherently superior to others. This is one of the many signifiers of favoritism which is defined as unjust actions directed against people based on their race. gender. ethnicity. nationality. linguistic communication. religion. or sexual orientation. Throughout the film. there are many illustrations of racism. Basically. the pupils traveling to that high school come from different background. and hence. at high school. they create separate “tribes” . Such folks where “south of the lodger – Latinos” . “little Cambodia” . “the ghetto” . “Wonder bread Land” . and others that were non mentioned.
There's a specialist from your university waiting to help you with that essay.
Tell us what you need to have done now!
order now
All of these “tribes” believed that their race is superior to the “other” . and if that “other” peculiar race would non be. their life would be much better. From this. many jobs taking to force. and even offense. aroused. Many pupils went to boot cantonments. or gaol for young persons. and lost a batch of their friends because of pack related activities. In add-on to this. in the film it was mentioned that in Long Beach. the topographic point where the action takes topographic point. it all comes down to what you look like ; Latino. Asian. Black. etc. They are so buried in their hatred towards each other. that it is likely to acquire changeable anytime you walk out of your door. The pupils fight each other for district. kill each other over race. pride and regard.
Prejudice is seen in the film every bit good. Prejudice is defined as a set of sentiments. attitudes. and feelings that below the belt cast a group and its members in a negative visible radiation. without legitimate grounds. In a manner. bias is tied to pigeonhole. On the other manus. stereotypes is more a false or generalised belief about a group of people that result in categorising members without respect for single mention. One illustration of a combination between bias and stereotype in this film is when Eva. one of the pupils in room 203. says to her instructor. that she hates her because she is white. The ground she gives for detesting on white people is that she knows what they can make. This is based on the experiences from her yesteryear. when some white bulls arrested her male parent. even though he was an guiltless adult male. In my sentiment. she is incorrect to generalise the full white species of worlds. harmonizing to a twosome of constabulary work forces. This is an illustration of over favoritism. because it is unfastened and obvious.
More exactly. it is at the first degree of favoritism which is antilocution. In this phase. it is talked about white people in uncomplimentary footings. and Eva freely discusses her negative feelings towards a certain group of people. which are white people. A 2nd of import illustration of stereotype in this film is when a really immature male child draws a drawing of a black pupil with hypertrophied characteristics. which resulted to be oversized lips. He made a immense error by pulling that and directing it around the schoolroom so people would laugh at it. This is when the instructor realized there was a common land between the pupils in room 203. and the Jews during the Holocaust. She instantly made the connexion when she saw the inappropriate drawing of the black adult male. She remembered and told her category how Judaic people were drawn with holding oversized olfactory organs. These were put in the newspaper by the Nazi. along with other “scientific” grounds that Judaic people were inferior to the remainder. and it did non count whether they lived or died. This is how the extinction of the Judaic people occurred during the World War 2.
Extinction is the most harmful degree of favoritism. The bias is so intense that victims are seen inferior to human species. and become marks of slaying or race murder. When the instructor asked the category who knew what the Holocaust was. merely one white individual out of the full organic structure of pupils knew. That is when she realized that the pupils had really small cognition about the outside universe. This greatly related to Gordon W. Allport’s theory. Allport was a psychologist who used questionnaires and interviews to mensurate the strength of single bias. and who found a correlativity between higher instruction and experiences such as cognition about civilizations. going. etc. and “tolerance” or the credence of differences between people. In this instance. because the pupils were non taught and were incognizant that there were similar instances to theirs. merely on a greater graduated table. they continued to prejudge. and know apart against each other. Later on in the film though. because they begin to go more and derive more cognition about the outside universe. they become more cognizant and recognize that they should alter. In add-on. three other theorists’ thoughts play a function in the film.
The first 1 is Frances Aboud. who believes that kids foremost learn bias from the media. household. friends. etc. when they are bombarded with negative images. In this film. the miss Eva is a perfect illustration of how she changed the manner she sees people. Since she was a small miss. her male parent used to state her that she had to contend for their people as the ascendants fought against those who say they are non equal in beauty and approval. and that she had to make anything she cud in order to keep her and her race’s pride and award ; even if that meant aching other guiltless people. This is how the household could act upon and determine a person’s beliefs from a really immature age. The 2nd theorist’s thought that I found in the film was Elliot Aronson’s. He talked about successfully desegregate schools. hence integrate different cultural backgrounds so they would larn how to work together in a productive mode. The last but non least. Beverly Tatum’s thoughts were presented in the film.
She said that to acquire rid of the negative stereotyping in our society. you have to get down by pass oning to one another. acquire to cognize each other by prosecuting into conversations to happen common things. This was the chief thought in my sentiment. since the film is named “The Freedom Writers” . Once they shared their worst experiences with each other. the kids really felt the hurting of one another. and they started to appreciate and acquire along better. Sociologists would look at the grounds why people discriminate against one another. and seek to happen out solutions to stop it. One of the solutions would be excessively travel more. happen out about other civilizations. instead than your ain.
A individual who is ethnocentric strongly favors their ain sort or ethnicity over others. By going. you may detect cognize things that were unknown to you antecedently. and come to recognize that there are other civilizations in the universe that are as diverse and phenomenal as yours. Anthropologists would look at issues analyze issues about race and come to the decision that people have been conditioned to see human races as separate divisions within the human species based on seeable physical differences. This is really incorrect. because in a sense. it is like a paradigm. A paradigm is a set of regulations and conditions stored in our encephalons that a individual uses to understand centripetal experiences. We have a filter to state us based on how a peculiar individual looks. his/her image. whether or non they can be trusted. whether or non they are unsafe. etc. In my sentiment this is a really incorrect manner to look at a individual because you do non really see the individual for who he/she is. but based on images that are stored in your head from media. friends. anterior experiences. instruction. personal background. and other influences.
The lessons that can be learned from this movie are excessively many to name. However. some would be that we should non know apart against people before we get to cognize them. I say this because I am 100 % certain that one time you take the clip to acquire to cognize the individual. you would non be able to know apart against them any longer. Second. you should spread out your basic cognition learned in school with other books. trips. reading journals of people that were willing plenty to print them. in order to larn from their errors. and one time you have a better apprehension. you will see them with different eyes.
To be honest. I have watched this film three times so far and I still did non acquire tired of watching. I liked it really much. Even though I was ne’er discriminated against. because the kids were around my age. I could easy absorb with them. I cried. laughed. American ginseng along with them. It was a great film. and it taught me many valuable things that I am certain are traveling to come in ready to hand in life. Who knew media could really be good sometimes? film: Freedom Writers
