Looking At Different Prisoners Dilemmas Through Time Religion Essay

The drama was played for one hebdomad and the consequences were monitored really closely throughout the clip frame. All the participants were given merely the general guidelines while the behaviour carried out by them was non scripted and during one hebdomad the responses by each participant during this drama were 100 percent natural.

Mike Lee was more extravert and really active kind of cat. He was really chatty and friendly with the group. Prior to the undertaking and play he was involved in jocks and games. He was a really societal cat with many friends. He was vocal during his twenty-four hours to twenty-four hours personal businesss. He brought his natural inherent aptitudes with him in the drama every bit good. He was a squad participant and co-op in the squad.

Wayne Peterson was a bulky in build and non every bit active as Mike Lee. He was low on the graduated table of emotional stableness. He was aggressive and short tempered kind of cat who was ever ready to take a battle with anyone, even on minor jobs. He was the lone individual of his type in the squad. In day-to-day life he was an angry immature adult male with few friends. During the drama, he was the most hard adult male to manage.

Bill Scott could be rated high on agreeableness factor among the large five personality dimensions. He was an first-class squad participant and was the softest hearted individual among the batch. Beside the drama he was a assisting friend. His friends were ever comfy with him. His composure and relaxed personality has given him the border to do strong interpersonal relationships with other.

I could be rated high in the conscientiousness. I am really responsible and reliable adult male. Even in the immature age I am really organized with all the leading qualities. Peoples of mine type are born leaders and I am among those. I ever used to presume the leading undertakings automatically even in his day-to-day life. During my stay in high school and college, I used to take my group and used to originate every undertaking. Among the gross revenues squad I was a outstanding chap.

James Gray was a different kind of adult male with an unknown endowment. On the graduated table of openness to see he could be rated as low. He could be defined as follower. He was non really originative or inventive and even he was non curios to larn different things. In one thing he was the best and that was following orders. He was a speedy scholar but ever relied on spoon eating. He used to catch the lessons really rapidly which were taught to the, as he was really difficult working but he was non able to make those things in his ain manner. He used to make everything which was asked to make. He was non a determination shaper or good in taking enterprises.

Prisoner Dilemma

All we five friends were assigned the function of a sales representative. But in world the aims and ends were existent and there was a inducement associated with them to maintain them motivated, which made the game existent and the behaviours which were observed could be classified as really much closer to the existent behaviour of the squad members in a squad.

All of us were really motivated and driven to win. To accomplish their marks we were willing to make anything to accomplish our ends. Besides the fiscal inducement the aim was to turn out ourselves and crush the other squad member. Normally, the sales representative that brings most leads, most assignments or the most referrals is considered to be the best gross revenues adult male or the top performing artist but as we were covetous of each other and self involvement was dominant in all of us. We all decided to undermine the public presentations of the other squad members and we all started back biting and speaking dirt about the other participants.

This spoiled the benefit of the squad and the affected the consequences. Team is normally supposed to do the synergism affect. When squad participants work together in a group to accomplish the set desire or the end they make 1+1=11. If we all co-operated to endeavor for one end, we all would be better off. But due to the homo ‘s green-eyed monster and self involvement, many times, we get in the manner of what would be better off for us every bit good as for the other people of our squad or company.

There is a really celebrated lesson given by the captive ‘s quandary which should be kept in head during any competition. “ Acting in one ‘s self involvement does non ever serve one ‘s self involvement. ”

How good did the personality appraisals reflect in the behaviours participants displayed during the game?

During the game all the participants showed their natural behaviour as it was more like a existent competition than world. All the participants tried their best to sell their laptops to accomplish their coveted consequences. Mike Lee who was more extravert and chatty, was able to sell two laptops in a hebdomad where as I was able to sell one laptop during one hebdomad. Mike Lee was able to done it due to his accomplishments as he was good in pass oning with other while I sold one laptop all due to my committedness and readability to accept the new challenges. To turn out myself the best, urged me to sell the laptops at any cost. No other participant was able to sell even a individual laptop. Bill Scott tried his best but he was non affectional. He went to his friends and people who knew him, but no one took him earnestly. James Gray was the weakest participant. He did n’t cognize what to make as there was no 1 to steer him. He wasted the whole hebdomad and done nil. He merely asked for different thoughts and cipher helped him as everyone was looking for personal aims. Wayne Peterson tried but due to his aggressive nature and kind pique, he ended up in muss. He caused problems for the squad members every bit good. Overall the whole undertaking was a floating-point operation and the whole squad sold merely three laptops and no 1 was able to acquire the single inducement.

What do these appraisals tell us about how we perceive ourselves versus how others perceive us?

Many times it happens that we forget about the others that what they perceive about us and our whole attending and attempts are in accomplishing our ends. This is the clip when we show our true image to others in the same manner people who forget everything to accomplish their aims could be learnt the best. During the appraisal, self centric attack of all the participants proved the point of position. We all forgot what other people will comprehend about us. We were busy in making our undertaking and in the terminal the consequence was dissatisfactory.

The other point which got proved, that, every human perceives that he is making right and other people are incorrect. Whatever they are making is the right manner of making it. They ever justify their incorrect behaviors as good and knock and indicate out other people who are involved in unethical patterns.

3. What informal functions did participants presume during the game, and were they different from the be aftering part from the playing part of the exercising?

I was high in conscientiousness, tried to take the group in the beginning of the game but my attempts were non fruitful as everyone was traveling for their ain ego involvement. Mine attempt of do the group a existent squad was supported by Bill Scott as he was high in amenity. But the party was ruined by Wayne Peterson who was low in emotional stableness. During the whole drama he assumed the function of job Godhead and a bad cat for all of the squad members. He used to travel in the opposite way every clip when the squad tries to make a determination. James Gray assumed the function of follower as expected. Without utilizing his common sense he used to follow other which ended up in a catastrophe for him and for the whole squad every bit good. He has n’t sold any of the laptop. During that one hebdomad Mike Lee assumed the function of buffer who ever helped in cut downing the impact of aggression of Wayne Peterson by his art of communicating.

4. What did I learn about myself?

Due to this drama I got the best lesson of my life about my personality. This has helped me in cognizing what I am and how could I better myself. I have come to cognize that I force my determination on others and inquire them to follow as it is. This kind of behaviour is acceptable when any one is a director but at the degree where other collogues and members are on a same hierarchy, does non work. Leading the group is ever good but enforcing your leading on other squad members creates jobs for others every bit good as for me. Wayne Paterson who was non willing to accept me as a leader showed his aggression and resisted me which is non a good thing when you are working on a same hierarchy and squad.

5. What did I learn about person else in the exercising? Did you see something new about them?

The whole exercising has taught me a batch. I have taught from other participants as good. The best character was Mike Lee, who was really balanced adult male. He was good in covering with other people. He knows how to manage different state of affairss. He is a strong truster of dialogues. He believes that all the jobs can be solved by discoursing it on the tabular array. Wayne Peterson is an aggressive adult male who is blowing his aggression in non productive manner. If he uses his aggression in a right way, his failing can go his strongest point. Bill Scott is a really sort hearted adult male. He is really friendly. He has shown a nice behaviour during the whole exercising but James Gray is a also-ran. He does non cognize what to make and where to travel. Whatever you ask him he will make in exact same manner. Comparing all the members, Mike Lee was the best among us. As a gross revenues adult male every one of us must give him a recognition. His personality suits the occupation of a salesman and he has assumed the occupation really good. Overall he was a balanced adult male with good nature and personality as he knows how to do other people happy.

6. In playing your game, what could you hold done to increase concerted behaviours?

The squad work is the most of import thing in accomplishing any end. If we had used squad work and co-operation, the consequences would be reasonably different. The best tool to make any consequence favourable for all is dialogues. We could hold used dialogues to settle down the jobs. We ne’er thought that we would neglect without a squad work. Everyone was really confident and we had a ego believe that we could accomplish our marks really easy. Other than that there must be a team leader among the squad which must be nominated by the squad. This helps in giving squad a sense of aim and way. The squad is answerable to the leader which helps the squad overall in run intoing the concluding aims.

I tried to presume the function of leading but as I was non nominated by the whole squad, caused jobs among the squad member and whole state of affairs got out of control. We would hold made a program to accomplish our ends before get downing gross revenues. If that would go on, it had given us the opportunity to place our human resource and utilizing them in the most effectual mode, depending on their capablenesss.

7. Based on your game experience, what are some of the cardinal factors involved in deriving cooperation from people in a concern scene?

Peoples co-operate merely when they are asked to make so in a really low manner. One can non hold received cooperation forcefully. In any squad apparatus, there is a demand of a group treatment in which some of the members emphasize on the importance of squad cooperation. There are many benefits of a squad which could be utilizing by affectional squad direction. As mentioned earlier, there is a strong demand administering functions and duties among the squad members and assign undertakings which a group or squad member is capable of making that. In presence of a squad leader or director, this undertaking is to be done by him. It ‘s his duty to detect the capablenesss and personality traits of every squad member before delegating a undertaking to him. But in absence of any supervisor, squad has to discourse and administer the undertakings among themselves, depending upon the fortes of every squad member. Cooperation could be gained by tie ining group inducements on a peculiar occupation every bit good. In such instances all the squad members and other related people cooperate and work together in order to acquire the group benefits.

8. How would you travel about acquiring cooperation from a “ hard ” colleague? Give an illustration or scenario.

It is non really easy to acquire cooperation from every group members. Some group members are really different than the other 1s. Peoples like Wayne Peterson who are really aggressive in nature are hard to manage. With the experience got from the game I would be inquire him for sharing benefits and work in consequence of a cooperation. In such state of affairs the relation will be give and take. I would inquire him to assist me and in return I will assist you. Mentioning to the game we played, I could hold asked him to sum up the mark and attempts. In a consequence if we had sold three laptops it would ensue in inducement, which could be shared by both of us.