The temples in India have ever taken an of import topographic point in their cultural and religious life of its people, from the early times and boulder clay presents. In fact the whole cultural and religious life of Indian people is built around the temple. The overall intent of the Hindu temple can be presented in such a manner: like the Himalayas, the temple points to the celestial spheres, the residence of the Gods. The Hindu temple, “ measure by measure, shape-by-shape ” reverses this aboriginal descent and topographic points adult male back on the way toward Eden.
Temples were normally built in topographic points marked by particular holiness.A The fables associated them with the Acts of the Apostless of Vishnu, Shiva, Durga and other gods.A In the 4-5 centuries, when Hindooism during the reign of Gupta dynasty, became the province faith, the chief structural elements of the temples were plinth, sanctuary and superstructure.A The rock base of a Hindu temple symbolized the communion table, on which the temple itself was sacrificed to a deity.A With the modular features of the proportions of the temple step cap non taken into account.A The temple was conceived as a structural unit, resting on the altar.A In some early temples the wall of the sanctuary served as chief walls of the edifice, in others – the sanctuary was surrounded by a 2nd ring of walls, which created a particular gallery to circumvent.A In any instance, the churches were dark inside.A
Faculty for Hindu temples and their centre was a sculpture of a divinity – his idol.A Temple priests were called “ defenders of the graven image and the retainers of God, whose home was in the temple. Modern scientific analysis of a temple shows that temple-space is surcharged with great positive energy and the visitants can experience physical public assistance and mental wellbeing. This fact rises a batch of inquiries: how could a construction built of rock or of brick have that sort of energy? What makes the temple so powerful?
There is a scientific position that a temple is “ non a place of God but it is the signifier of God ” that means that the temple construction itself is worthy of worship. ( Michell, P. 68. )
The temple architecture is a scientific phenomenon. The basic construct that determines worthiness of the construction and signifier of temple is “ The layout adopted for temple signifier is synonymous with the layout of the Cosmos ” . The program of the layout of a temple is technically called Mandala or Vaastu Pada with a grid of 8x 8 =64 infinites or 9x 9 = 81 infinites of equal dimensions. In modern architectural nomenclature this can be addressed as energy-grid. Those two layouts are the geometrical expression to retroflex the elusive substance of the existence into ocular stuff signifier. ( Volwahsen, p 44 )
The of import facet of Hindu temple is that it serves as a cosmic intersection of adult male, God, and the Universe. But it besides is the Universe, reflected in its reiterating architectural signifiers. The careful mathematical measurings that lie in the basic building of a Hindu temple express the construction of the Universe. For illustration, in order for the temple to confront east, its breadth must be a perfect multiple of the fraction three-eighths. The outer dimensions of the temple must besides fulfill five other equations associating to stars, planets and the transition of clip. ( Kramrisch, p.132 )
Another of import analogy is between the temple and the mountain that can assist to understand the Godhead intent of the temple-to service as a meeting topographic point between adult male and the Gods. It means that the Gods could fall to be in the presence of adult male, like human psyches lifting up to run into the Gods. ( Rao, p. 126 )
The piece of land upon which the temple stands is itself a sacred location – a tirtha, a Sanskrit word literally intending “ traversing topographic point ” is a site favored by the Gods where H2O, shadiness and privacy are plentiful. Temples must be built on tirthas in order to function their true intent as traversing topographic points, and this site choice is merely the first measure in constructing a temple.
Another of import facet is the vastu-purusa-mandala, that is a unsmooth architectural design for the foundation of the temple, that serves both a practical and a extremely symbolic intent, going the architectural and religious foundation of the Hindu temple. ( Rao, P. 135. )
As suggested earlier, the temple is besides a microcosm of the Universe, the mandala reflects this facet of the temple every bit good: the centre square of the mandala stands for the fabulous mountain of Meru, the geographic centre of the universe. Around Mount Meru is arranged a symbolic pantheon of Gods, and each God occupies its ain square and is ranked in importance by its propinquity to the centre. ( Rao, P. 135. )
The following portion of this essay analyzes separate elements of the temple, both interior and exterior, and topographic points these elements within the context of the temple ‘s godly intent: to function as a cosmic meeting topographic point for fan and divinity.
The garbhagrha, the sanctum sanctorum of the Hindu temple, presents itself as a point of going: if the temple is a mountain, the garbhagrha is the cave inside the mountain. The garbhagrha is dark, and its walls are mostly unadorned, that contrasts the outside of the temple, which is frequently extremely flowery and full with 1000s of graven images. The simple darkness of the sanctum reflects its map as a “ uterus house, ” one of the significances of garbhagrha. ( Kramrisch, p. 169 )
Analysis of Hindu temples in Nagara and Dravida manners
The two temples described here, one at Khajuraho ( Madhya Pradesh ) , the other at Angkor Wat, give the best possible thought of how the contrasting Nagara and Dravida manners had developed by the 11 century and present aesthetic accomplishments of the Hindu architectural tradition.
Style Nagara, which developed during the 5h century, is characterized by a tower-type hive ( called “ shikhara ” ) made up of several words of architectural elements, such as kapotas and gavaksas, climaxing in a big unit of ammunition shock absorber like component, named “ amalaka ” , andA idiom “ Drum ” .A The program of the temple is based on the square, but the walls are frequently broken down cosmetic elements in making the feeling that the tower is round.A In more recent temples the cardinal mandapa was surrounded by several little temple edifices, making a ocular consequence of a fountain.
From the seventh century Dravida, or southern manner, has formed a pyramidal tower dwelling of increasingly decreasing grades, constriction, and the dome on top, besides called shikhara ( in the southern nomenclature ) .A Repeated horizontal grades visually impart the southern temples knee bends.
Less obvious differences between the two chief temple types Nagara and Dravida include the program country, the choice and agreement of rock, from which the cut shapes on the external walls and the inside, the scope of cosmetic elements.
In malice of their obvious stylistic differences, the temples at Khajuraho and Angkor Wat have basic rules connected with Hindu beliefs and patterns.
Kandariya Mahadeva temple, Khajuraho
This temple was built in the center of the eleventh century by one of the male monarchs of the Chandella dynasty, this great Shiva temple represents the Nagara manner ad is one of the best accomplishments.
Kandariya Mahadeva temple is the tallest memorial at Khajuraho, its steeple lifting more than 30.5 meters above the pedestal on which the temple is elevated. The temple has 30.5 meters in length and 20 meters in breadth. Like other to the full developed Chandella temples at
Khajuraho, it consists of a additive east-west sequence of entree stairss, entryway porch, columned hall with side balconies, and linga shrine with encircling passageway, away which open three extra balconies, that conveying porches. The porches serve as balconies with high seating, conveying airing and visible radiation to the inside.
What distinguishes the Kandariya Mahadeva temple from the other memorials a Khajuraho is its expansive graduated table and amplification of design and ornamentation. Undoubtedly, the glorification of the temple is its exalted curving tower, crowned by an amalaka ( ribbed round motive ) .
Very important in the temple is the sculptural intervention of its outer walls, which are covered with images of the God Shiva, to whom the memorial is dedicated, with consorts, attenders and lesser deities. Important among the images here are the facet of the God, including those who subdues the blind devil, the cosmic terpsichorean, and the destroyer of the ternary devil metropoliss. The sculptures are arranged in three grades on the exterior, amounting to no less than 646 figures in all, non numbering the 226 figures of the inside.
The temple is good known for its titillating groups which are placed on the occasion of the walls of the mandapa and the passageway environing the sanctuary, taging one of the most ceremonially vulnerable parts of the memorial. Among the other images are those of female
divinities, such as the seven female parents, allow entirely the countless apsaras, or heavenly maidens that attend on the Gods, and who are shown in tempting positions that reveal the command of
the Khajuraho creative persons in rendering female contours with witting edification and ebullient grace.
Angkor Wat in Cambodia, is the 2nd Hindu temple described in the paper, that refers to the Dravida manner. This temple was dedicated to the Hindu God Vishnu, the refinisher of the universe. Angkor Wat is a mammoth threeaˆ?step pyramid adorned by nine slender towers of tremendous tallness, the stairss of the pyramid are capped by galleries. Framed by an enclosure wall and a olympian fosse, the temple covers 2.5 square kilometers.
The pyramid is raised on a huge patio of 2 m high, and surrounded by naga bannisters. It opens to the central points by entryway marquees and staircases. The stairss are crowned by environing galleries: the first measure, incorporating the gallery of the basreliefs, is 203 m big and 3 m high. Pavilions mark the corners, at the corners of the 2nd grade are four towers, their superstructure is partially losing. The outer gallery of the pyramid, including the
western corner marquees, shelters the most cherished hoarded wealths of Angkor Wat, alleviation in a entire length of more than 600 m. They depict narrative scenes from mythology and history. Reliefs do non merely embroider a temple ; they make it a sacred infinite. In the images which depict the Gods and their workss, the Gods themselves are present, and figures and parts of the organic structure are either shown frontally or in profile. Reliefs were ever carved in situ, after the walls had been finished ; they were cut into the rock.
It is of import to advert 12 staircases rise to the 3rd degree of the pyramid. All five towers open to the central waies, giving unfastened positions along the galleries, and the overall image was a broad and aired hall, full of visible radiation. The 3rd degree, where are the finest alleviation of Devata, was the throne room of God Vishnu.
As for the symbolism of the temple, Angkor Wat is an unexcelled image of the Mount Meru, the residence of the Gods in the Centre of the universe. Matching to the five extremums of this mountain, at Angkor Wat five towers were seeable from every central way. The enclosure wall symbolizes the mountains environing and concealing the Mount Meru ; the fosse symbolizes the cosmic ocean. The temple composite is a microcosm, an image of a perfect universe, stable and in geometrical harmoniousness.
We can see that Angkor Wat, every bit good as Kandariya Mahadeva temple, as all Hindu temples serves as a cosmic intersection of adult male, God, and the Universe, and besides the Universe is reflected in its reiterating architectural signifiers.