this is only my opinion it is not a real answer but i think that if it existed they would have the biggest trade in the world and they would have a very big civilization im sorry if this didnt help u but heres the real answer:The popular notion among Han Chinese is that our civilization has existed for 5,000 years, since the Yellow Emperor (Huang Di) in around 3,000 BC. However, there is no archaeological evidence of Huang Di, Zhuan Xu, Di Ku, Yao, and Shun, so we regard them as at least semi-legendary. There is hardly even conclusive evidence of the Xia dynasty, which is believed to have been founded around 2,070 BC. And even for the Shang dynasty, which has been dated as beginning in 1,600 BC, the first concrete date we have for a reign is Pan Geng’s, which started in 1,300 BC with the moving of the capital to Yin.
order now
There's a specialist from your university waiting to help you with that essay.
Tell us what you need to have done now!
order now
So would it be more historically responsible to regard our history as being about 4,000 years old at most? Or 3,000? Or would it be better to regard ‘China’ as only coming into existence with the Qin imperial unification of 221 BC? (u can cut and paste if its too much to write thanks i hope i helped
