The book of Acts explains the history of the Christian church and the spread of the Gospel of Jesus Christ. Although many faithful retainers were used to prophesy and learn the Gospel of Jesus Christ, Saul of Tarsus, whose name was alteration to Paul was one of such people.
In this essay I am traveling to contrast and compare the experience of Saul of Tarsus in the book of Acts 9:1-19, Acts 22:6-16 and Acts 26 12-23, And I will research the differences and similarities.
There's a specialist from your university waiting to help you with that essay.
Tell us what you need to have done now!
order now
SAUL EXPEDITION TO DAMASCUS
Saul was an influential adult male, who had great desire in oppressing and killing Christians before he was converted. Paul ‘s transition on the Damascus route ( Acts 9:1-31 ) is a high spot of the book of Acts. After his transition there was a
positive alteration in his attack and he went to the extreme with God, prophesying his word with power and the Spirit of the true and living God.
Saul, who had an brush with the Lord on his manner to Damascus in a blazing of visible radiation from the heavenly. This indicated a true strong belief of God ‘s disclosure to his bosom and this brought about the disclosure of the word, ‘Saul, Saul, why has 1000 persecuted me ‘ ? ( Acts 9:4 )
As a consequence of this brush with the Lord, Saul was blinded and led into Damascus and spent three yearss without nutrient or drink. This remarkable act brought a true strong belief and world to his bosom. Saul had a vision of a adult male named Ananias, who laid custodies on him to reconstruct his sight. However this vision became existent and Saul ‘s sight was restored and he was filled with the Holy Ghost and power to make feats as a true courier and retainer of the Lord.
COMPARE AND CONTRAST SAUL ‘S Experience
ON HIS WAY TO DAMASCUS ( ACTS 9:7 )
Saul whose name was alteration to Paul had a dramatic experience on the route to Damascus. In Acts 9:7, the work forces going with Saul heard a voice, in contrast, Acts 22:9 provinces that the work forces did non hear or understand the voice.
Gleason L. Archer uses this differentiation to explicate the text, ‘Therefore the work forces going with Saul of Tarsus heard a voice but did non understand the words spoken ; merely Saul heard and understood the words spoken based on the manner that Luke reported the transition narrative ‘ . Acts 9:4 and Acts 22:7 provinces that Saul entirely fell to the land and in Acts 26:14, everybody fell on the land, and the work forces with Paul stood dumb hearing the voice but seeing no 1. In Acts 22:9, those who were with him saw the visible radiation to be sun but did non understand one who was talking.
EXPLORING THE SIMILARITIES AND DIFFERENCES
In examing the similarities and differences in Saul brush on his manner to Damascus giving an history of his experience, it was at twelve noon on his manner to Damascus, that a voice was heard but cipher was seen, and this voice that arrested Saul was the voice of Jesus, nevertheless the significance of this brush was that during noon, the Sun radiances brighter and so strong but what hit Saul was a brighter visible radiation, that radiances brighter and stronger than that of the Sun. Not merely did Saul brush this experience but the visible radiation from heaven brought the whole company down into the dust. The interesting characteristic in this brush with Saul was the presentation of a supernatural influence on nature that brought sightlessness to Saul for three yearss and this remarkable act brought about Saul true strong belief.The sarcasm of this experience is that the voice or the word that was heard was spoken in their ain Hebrew linguistic communication but did non convey any message to them, even though they heard the voice but did non understand the message and this signifies that the company was affected physical while that of Saul ‘s experience was more of religious. And in Acts 22:7 “ Paul entirely fell to the land bespeaking a entire entry and resignation to the authorization of God. While in Acts 26:14 “ Paul ‘s full company fell to the land.
In Acts 9:7, provinces that Paul did n’t see anything and in Acts 22:9, Pauls Company saw the reflecting visible radiation but could non give history of it
Decision
Having viewed the similarities and analyze the differences, In my decision, we can clearly see and province that the brush and the experience of Paul on his journey to Damascus so was a disclosure of the presentation of the power of God, in relation to our attack to the things of God. It besides shows how of import it is to obey the word and the will of God, and the alterations that occurs as a consequence of knowing and holding a right standing with God. These were the few experience that was demonstrated in the history of Saul, whose name was subsequently alteration to Paul on his journey to Damascus. Another astonishing event was that of the Godhead act of forgiveness, in malice of all that Saul had committed against God, he still enjoys the celestial heritage common to those who are set apart for God. He was non negated of God but alternatively was usage of God.
