Are Islamic Law And Islamic Ethics Identical Religion Essay

Islam is a comprehensive faith that trades with traditional and modern-day issues. All affairs of life whether it is matrimony or divorce issues, wellness or medical related issues, heritage, testimony etc. each one can be addressed at length by Islam. Thus it is a faith in entirety and is ageless. It had solutions for jobs and issues in the past and encompasses solutions to the present and future issues.

Here it is of import to throw visible radiation on the faith Islam, Islamic Law and Islamic Ethics.

The inquiry is “ Are Islamic Law and Islamic Ethics indistinguishable? ” I would state that Islamic Law and Islamic Ethical motives are non indistinguishable but are elaborately interlacing, supplement, strengthen and augment each other. Islamic Law and Ethical motives are connected by a common “ Sharia ” which can be explained as the way that leads to the beginning or the ideal codification of behavior. Muslims need to voyage this way of life or follow this ideal codification of behavior as per counsel of God, Quran and Sunnah. Now we need to see what is the typical about the relationship between Law and Ethics in Islam. In order to make so we need to understand the connexion and nexus between Islamic Law and Islamic Ethics in several stairss. First harmonizing to Islam, Law must ever be ethical so anything unethical is illegal for Muslims. The Southern Cross is that all unethical things are illegal therefore jurisprudence is equal to moralss in Islam. Furthermore Islamic Ethics transcends Islamic Law that is Muslim Ethical motives is greater or superior or is beyond Law. Law brings us to the degree of duties and prohibitions but Islam takes us a measure higher than the jurisprudence, it describes and prescribes ethical values like mobility, pureness, wholesomeness etc. For Islam one needs to make the best thing, non merely what is prescribed by the jurisprudence but something beyond, something that pleases and pleasures God. Thus we are justified to state that Islamic moralss took a two tined attack. It non merely challenged or broke the regulation that jurisprudence is equal to moralss, it besides claimed that moralss is greater than jurisprudence. Furthermore Islam says that do as Allah says, even beyond the obligatory ( halal ) and prohibited ( haram ) . For Islam, moralss is ever more than jurisprudence.

Herein it is besides of import to distinguish between Islamic and non Islamic and secular impressions of jurisprudence and morality.

As mentioned earlier for Islam, jurisprudence and moralss are the same or instead moralss supersedes but looking at non-Islamic or secular impressions of jurisprudence and morality, it needs to be clarified that herein jurisprudence and faith are separate. Furthermore in secular moralss, moralss elements are non looking at God as the supreme and they do non look or see at disclosure or Bible. Since secular moralss does non mention to any Bible or disclosure therefore secular moralss and jurisprudence are two separate entities. For Muslims the ideal codification of behavior is Sharia which is broader, which has wider range and nonsubjective than a individual legal system or jurisprudence of western system or secular system. Sharia is every bit jurisprudence and morality every bit good as faith and etiquette. Muslim law or jurisprudence ( Fiqh ) is a composite mark of jurisprudence and morality. Thus the extended intertwining of Islamic Law and Islamic Ethics and its tremendous dependance on faith is clear. Herein it is relevant to province that western moralss is a strand of secular moralss.

Western jurisprudence has a treble theoretical account in which Acts of the Apostless are classified as Required, Permissible or forbidden. However Islamic jurisprudence has five fold theoretical account of duty known as Ahkam -al-khamsa ( the five judgements of normative classs ) . These classs are antiphonal for all human behaviors that are ideas, feelings, Acts of the Apostless and statements. These classs include:

Duty or Required ( Farz )

Recommended ( Sunnah or Mandub )

Permissible or simply allowable ( Jaiz or Mubah )

Disliked or discouraged ( Makruh )

Prohibited or forbidden ( Haram )

Apart from the quintuple theoretical account of Islam and three fold theoretical account in the West, it needs to be emphasized that the reading of duty in West in general is different from that in Islam. This is because in Islam duty in morality and duty in jurisprudence are derived likewise and overlapped in their demands. Second the evidences are based on the will of Allah as revealed in Quran and by the life of the Prophet ( PBUH ) . Thus faith, jurisprudence and moralss are intertwined in a common Islamic law which is the ideal codification of behavior. Sharia has a much wider range and intent than the simplistic legal system of the West.

As Muslims we need non merely to carry through our duties and chorus from prohibitions but besides need to move, believe, experience, province etc as per the likes, disfavors recommendations of Allah.

Islamic jurisprudence encompasses public and private jurisprudence that is condemnable jurisprudence, matrimony and divorce Torahs, heritage jurisprudence etc. all are addressed by Islam. Thus Islam addresses in entirety. Every individual human act or feeling has a jurisprudence to it. This is jurisprudence in entirety or Sharia. In secular jurisprudence there are three classs as mentioned and furthermore there are no Torahs that could turn to our everyday, day-to-day life issues like heritage, matrimony etc. In a nutshell spiritual and secular moralss have the undermentioned differences:

For spiritual system, moralss and jurisprudence are inseparable whereas in secular system moralss and jurisprudence are separate entities.

In Islamic system, moralss supersedes jurisprudence whereas in secular moralss both have in connexion.

In Islam jurisprudence and faith same as ethical Torahs are derived from disclosure. In western moralss, ethical Torahs do non look at disclosure or Bible. Law and faith offprint.

Moslems have the ethical component within them that is the ‘Ruh ‘ ( spirit ) . Western moralss are discovered, they need to be explored and identified. For this designation of ethical elements ‘Aql ‘ or ground is used. Since western system does non believe in disclosure and aql or ground entirely is deficient to understand infinity, therefore it remains uncomplete and obscure.

Muslim moralss is a dateless ageless model where as layman or western moralss has a temporal model.

Let ‘s inquire ourselves “ Is Law or Ethical motives more of import than the other in modern-day times? ” Coming to the modern-day or modern times, I think jurisprudence and moralss both play a critical function in determining our lives here in this universe and in the life thenceforth. For Muslims if Islam is practiced to the full and whole heartedly jurisprudence and moralss both are inclusive in the spiritual patterns. In secular pattern the jurisprudence does non include the ethical elements ; hence they need to be catered to in some manner. The same inquiry whether moralss or jurisprudence is of import could besides be addressed by saying that Islamic Ethics is more of import because it includes jurisprudence and goes beyond it or supersedes it to turn to modern-day issues. I think it would be just adequate to state that both are of import and affiliated and give strength and cogency to each other.

Position:

My base is that jurisprudence and morality or moralss are inseparable. One needs to be an ethical individual following Torahs, rules and values laid down by one and merely God and his Prophet as revealed by disclosure, Bible, Sunnah and Sharia.

Let ‘s throw visible radiation on how good equipped are Islamic divinity, jurisprudence and spiritualty to undertake modern-day issues in medical jurisprudence and bioethics.

In my sentiment Islamic divinity, jurisprudence, spiritualty and moralss are good equipped to undertake modern-day issues in Medical jurisprudence and Bioethics. In order to turn to current modern issues in medical jurisprudence and bioethics we need and have to seek safety in Islamic jurisprudence, Islamic divinity, spiritualty and moralss. These together are good equipped to react to contemporary issues efficaciously and expeditiously. Islamic divinity or Iman, Islamic spiritualty or Ihsan and Islamic Law or law or Islam together aid reference assorted issues and jobs of today ‘s clip whether these are inquiries refering to euthanasia, abortion, assisted reproduction etc.