Since the controversial 2000 votes that proverb George Bush being elected to presidency with bulk of electoral montage ballots. locking out Al Gore who had bulk of ballots countrywide. there have been demands for a alteration in the manner presidents are elected. Peoples and peculiarly Democrats have been demanding for a alteration with some believing that the 2000 elections had been “stolen” despite the facts indicating to the fundamental law as the footing of his triumph.
Because the Electoral montage is formed by representatives elected from all provinces. it can be entrusted with the duty of taking the top leaders because it ensures a balance in ballots between provinces. It can take penchant over popular ballot because at times there may be unjust advantages to campaigners from provinces with high populations acquiring bulk of ballots but with bulk of protagonists from their province at that place by conveying out unjust representation. ( Snead. 2009 )
There's a specialist from your university waiting to help you with that essay.
Tell us what you need to have done now!
order now
Because of the influence that the politician are likely to hold on the people during runs. people who are non independent at the same clip uneducated may stop up being confused and ballot for the incorrect individual because of the promises given to them some of which may be false. Therefore if they are left to do a direct determination they may stop up doing a incorrect pick as compared to an electoral montage where those who have won from different provinces meet and make the choosing which is considered safer because of the hazard of voting out of ignorance is greatly eliminated.
( Doherty. 2007 ) Electoral montage was charged with the duty of electing the president/chief executive and the frailty president but its representation reflected the ballots of citizens in all provinces in a rational manner. Article two. subdivision one of the U. S fundamental law was the footing of the Electoral Collage. Representatives in the montage come together after a 4 old ages period to elect the frailty president and the president of the province.
Because of the contentions that have come up over the period of two hundred old ages in which it has been put in pattern. there have been critics who have been vocal about altering the system but there have been possibly less vocal persons who have successfully managed to support the system through their powerful statements. ( Festa. 2001 ) Arguments against the electoral montage. Those who are opposed to the electoral montage manner of taking the frailty president and the president establish their statements on four major issues.
The first is the chance of taking a president considered to be a minor ( a president with lesser ballots ) ( Hoffman. 1996 ) . second is the hazard from “faithless” Voters. the 3rd is the likely goon of the montage stamp downing the elector turn out and eventually the chance of the montage missing proper and equal representation from all provinces. Harmonizing to Wagner. ( 2006 ) faithless Elector occurs when one promises to vote for the party campaigner but at the terminal he/she votes for a different campaigner from a different party. This can be avoided through riddance of single voters and alternatively utilize a pure mathematical process.
In the issue of electoral montage dejecting voter turn-out. it is argued that the montage may deter electors from voting in some provinces go forthing few citizens to make up one’s mind the electoral ballot for the full province. Although the statement may hold some weight in it. it can non number because elections can’t be carried out in a vacuity: electors have to vote. Arguments for electoral montage. Through the electoral montage. involvements of the rural minority and smaller states’ can besides be put into consideration merely like those from urban and to a great extent inhabited countries.
The montage ensures that the person who has attracted entreaty from bulk of the provinces wins the presidential elections. When there is a close competition between campaigners. the procedure of recount can easy be carried out where by merely ballots arising from a big province are recounted alternatively of the full ballots. The montage is besides a mark of “federalism” . Because of the electoral montage. multiple political parties have been gotten rid of giving manner to a two portion political system. The triumph gotten in the Electoral montage is considered to be legitimate and conclusive because even a little difference in border counts a batch.
In instances where there have been abnormalities in ballots of a given province. it doesn’t favor the opposition as it merely affects the ballots of that peculiar province. ( Doherty. 2007 ) Looking back at the history of America. the system has mostly contributed to the smooth running of elections in which they guarantee that the president selected is accepted by the bulk of citizen at the same clip efficient. Although abnormalities occurred during the earlier old ages. they have non been apparent in the recent yesteryear. The system has proved to be accurate in stand foring citizens from both rural and urban countries every bit and hence can be trusted.
Although popular ballot can be more representative of the population. there is hazard of persons who are uneducated and those who discriminate against campaigners based on issues such as race vote for a incorrect individual. Works Cited: Doherty. Brendan J. “Elections: The Politicss of the Permanent Campaign Presidential Travel and the Electoral College. 1977-2004. ” Presidential Studies Quarterly 37. 4 ( 2007 ) : 749+ . Questia. Web. 31 May 2010. Festa. Matthew J. “The Origins and Constitutionality of State Unit Voting in the Electoral College. ” Vanderbilt Law Review 54. 5 ( 2001 ) : 2099+ .
Questia. Web. 31 May 2010. Hoffman. Matthew M. “The Illegitimate President: Minority Vote Dilution and the Electoral College. ” Yale Law Journal 105. 4 ( 1996 ) : 935-1021. Questia. Web. 31 May 2010. Snead. O. Carter. “Public Bioethics and the Bush Presidency. ” Harvard Journal of Law & A ; Public Policy 32. 3 ( 2009 ) : 867+ . Questia. Web. 31 May 2010. Wagner. David S. “The Forgotten Avenue of Reform: the Role of States in Electoral College Reform and the Use of Ballot Initiatives to Effect That Change. ” The Review of Litigation 25. 3 ( 2006 ) : 575+ . Questia. Web. 31 May 2010.
