How could religion do force? Almost all faiths around the universe are based on love, peace and order. They all have certain regulations and rules that hold love, peace, and order together within a society, but as the widely known stating provinces: “ Rules are meant to be broken ; ” many people twist and misinterpret the sacred texts like the Bible, the Quran, the Torah, etc. Even though faiths around the universe are considered to be peaceable and harmless, still every individual faith in the universe and its texts have been misunderstood or misinterpreted. The consequences of this are motive and justification for force. This essay will research the assorted causes for force in the faiths around the universe, and it will closely discourse that force is, in fact, caused by the people who pattern faith, alternatively of faith itself, influenced by other factors outside of it.
Religion does posses a possible for extremism because it deals with utmost things. Peoples can compromise with little differences over boundary lines and district, but people can non compromise with the will of God since it is absolute. However, faith should be based on love, but it can rapidly be transformed into the opposite-hatred. It is the same as the passionate love between a adult male and a adult female can be transformed into homicidal green-eyed monster. Often adequate faith has been viewed as the premier suspect for force between cultural groups or within them. Religion can do force by misunderstanding of the messages that the sacred texts are supposed to direct, and a batch of the sacred texts are, in fact, misinterpreted and because of that, “ extremists ” find inspiration and justification that it is in their faith that they have to exert force upon others ( Hitchcock ) .
There's a specialist from your university waiting to help you with that essay.
Tell us what you need to have done now!
order now
A batch of the antediluvian and modern, major struggles are considered to be connected to religion in some manner. Any faith can be used as an alibi for force. For illustration, The Crusade Wars resulted in a batch of bloodshed on both Christian and Muslim sides of the mass struggle. Hebrews have committed race murder over states for the exclusive ground to carry through their cause. The war in 1991 in Yugoslavia pitted Catholic, Orthodox Christians, and Muslims against each other in a really bloody war. Violence in faith even exceeds struggles between different cultural groups ; it besides happens within the same cultural groups. In Burma, 1000s of monastics are being tortured and executed. Besides during the Christian Reformation 1000s of people were killed because of their spiritual beliefs. All of the followings of these faiths believed that they were making the right thing by traveling to war to protect their faith, “ eliminate the misbelievers or non trusters, ” or to derive control over the holy land ( Hopfe ) .
On the contrary, every faith in the universe is a peaceable one. In non one individual faith that exists or existed, in both past and present, preaches force to solutions of experiential jobs. In every individual one of the sacred texts, the Torah, the Quran, the Bible, the Theravada ‘s and all the others, there are rules and regulations that require people to stay by them. These rules forbid slaying, stealing, or making any injury to any human, and sometimes any other being in the universe. They are based on justness and nonpartisanship, they do n’t digest terrorist act or any other sort of extremism, in fact, they condemn it.
In all of the illustrations that were stated above, it would look that spiritual beliefs of people are the ground for major struggles and assorted violent Acts of the Apostless. That is non the instance ; in fact, the true grounds force of all time happens are economic, political, and even cultural differences. Even in the civilizations that religion plays a critical portion of mundane life there is nil like a pure spiritual struggle. There is ever some other outside factors involved. It could ne’er be, and it ne’er has been wide plenty to do terrorist act or any sort of utmost force. Peoples merely use faith as a justification for a force rhetoric or behaviour ( Cline ) . For illustration, economic sciences play a major function in struggles that are attributed to faith. Many soldiers that fought in the campaigns went for the wealth they would get from all the pillage they would make, aside from emancipating the holy land from the Muslims. The Muslims, on the other manus, they can besides be seen contending for the economic position. They fought to continue their late conquered land, to protect and reap the resources from it and roll up revenue enhancements from the people that live at that place. So if the exclusive ground people go into these struggles is their economic addition, than when the economic factor is taken out of the equation, people wo n’t hold anything to conflict approximately ; the justification would be removed. So this same illustration should be considered for faith besides. Even if faith is non the factor, it could still be called a spiritual struggle, if justifications are provided by faith. “ The being of other factors means that the remotion of faith might non stop the struggle, but the remotion of the primary justifications and accounts would hold to do important alterations in how the struggle is understood and pursued, non to advert its ultimate ends ” ( Cline ) . This means that faith is merely the justification for a struggle, and when faith is removed from a struggle the existent grounds are exposed ; the grounds like hatred and greed for power and wealth. In fact, merely because a batch of the people who engage in force, like warfare and terrorist act in the universe go on to be spiritual, or claim any sort of faith and spiritual philosophies as their grounds for moving, does n’t needfully intend that faith caused them to make those things. Indeed, for every violent spiritual extremist, there are many more people populating peacefully aside from them who exercise their same beliefs but merely take to move in a different manner. For illustration, for every violent Al Qaida Muslim terrorist in the universe, there are many more guiltless, Muslim people merely seeking to travel about their lives, and if they sympathize with Al Qaida, they are non holding with any violent extreme, which makes a immense difference in position. What about people that say that they act in conformity with their faith and “ pay sanctum wars? ” Even if the people believe that statement, the spiritual philosophy itself is non the cause of force ; alternatively, the individual that acts with that justification is the cause of force. Peoples pay wars, faiths do non. They merely use it as a tool to convey and unite others so they can accomplish their personal, egocentric ends. In other words, faith is being used as an alibi by “ holy warriors ” that do non digest other faiths. If they understand any sort of free will or the construct of human individuality, than they will recognize that it is non the philosophy, rhetoric or the faith, but it is the person that is responsible for his or her ain actions ( Newell ) .
Although faith is still considered to prophesy peace and love, some of the messages faith sends are misinterpreted by persons, which is the cause of force. The biggest ground force is connected to faith is because persons that are driven by greed and hatred towards other faiths, twist the positions of a peculiar faith, and show their deferred point of view to others, so by affecting God or any other supreme being they would acquire more followings. It is non the faith or the belief itself, but it is the actions of the person that cause mass harm and force between people. “ If possibly people really lived the good rules and non the readings of the rules of faith like charity, forgiveness, and personal answerability, the universe might, it merely might be a better topographic point ” ( Newell ) .
