In 2011. we have now seven billion people populating in this planet. Unfortunately. Earth’s estimated transporting capacity is merely approximately eleven to twelve billion people. With such a large job we are confronting today. it is of import to analyse and analyze what the bookmans of the yesteryear have to state of our increasing population. One of the celebrated population theoreticians of that clip is Thomas Malthus. In 1798. Malthus proposes his ain theory about population. Harmonizing to him. human populations grow exponentially while nutrient production grows at an arithmetic rate. Therefore. if the addition in our population is non controlled decently. so the figure of the people would increase faster than the nutrient supply. He stated that if this growing rate is allowed to go on. it would take to a nutrient deficit. To work out this job. he proposed three solutions. The first 1 is positive cheque. This method increases decease rates due to wars. dearths. disease. and natural catastrophes.
Preventive or negative cheque is the other 1. It lowers the birth rate which is accomplished through abortion. birth control. and celibacy. The last 1 is moral restraint which is forbearing from matrimony until the clip when a individual is capable of back uping a household. This two hundred-year-old theory is now go oning these yearss. It predicted the jobs of nutrient deficit that the universe is sing today because of the uncontrolled addition in population. Still. I can non to the full agree with Malthus because there are things that he forgot to take into consideration when he formulated this theory. One is the ability of adult male to increase the nutrient production as stated by Marx. He failed to acknowledge man’s ability to utilize scientific discipline and engineering to work out these population jobs like the possible developments in agricultural engineering which can increases the supply of nutrient.
There's a specialist from your university waiting to help you with that essay.
Tell us what you need to have done now!
order now
Possibly during that clip. scientific discipline is doing a slow advancement that he assume we can non rectify these jobs. Another one is the usage of birth control as a manner of cut downing population. He believed that holding merely few childs is the lone manner to halt or command the increasing growing rate. Furthermore. he confused the desire for sexual relationships with the desire to hold kids. He didn’t recognize that a individual can still prosecute in a sexual relationship and still don’t have a kid with the aid of preventives. Although Malthus’ theory has some loopholes. the necessities of the theory have non yet been demolished. There are some premises that turned out to be true.
RH measure
The generative wellness measure which is now a jurisprudence is the most controversial measure in the Philippines for decennaries which day of the month back to 1967. The measure is composed of subjects which deal with issues about household planning. maternal and child wellness. and generative and sexual conditions. Its chief aim is to raise the generative criterions of Filipinos by advancing regard for life. informed pick. birth spacing and responsible parentage which is conformity with the human rights criterions. It besides guarantees entree to medically-safe. legal and choice generative wellness attention services and relevant information.
Although it has assuring virtues. I do non back up the measure because of some of its faulty premises. One is the premise that overpopulation is the cause of poorness. In truth. there is truly no relationship between overpopulation and poorness but RH measure still insists that it is the cause of the declining poorness in our state. It is true that it is one of the factors but it is ne’er the root cause of poorness. What is the primary cause of poorness are the corruptness and the bad administration of the disposal. In fact. we are one of the most corrupt states in Southeast Asia.
Another premise is that Philippines is overpopulated. In world. there is no overpopulation in our state. It is true that our metropoliss are dumbly populated but in some parts of our state. there are little Numberss of people and some are still uninhabited.
One more job in the measure is the belief that preventives will forestall abortion and sexually familial diseases. We should non intrust our safety to the usage of these preventives in the bar of STDs because harmonizing to some surveies. there is no cogent evidence that rubbers. for illustration. is effectual in forestalling STDs. In the instance of abortions. it did non truly decrease the incidents. Harmonizing to a survey in Spain. a 10-year period of an increasing usage of prophylactic devises had been paralleled by a significantly increasing figure of abortions.
Though it is already a jurisprudence. I hope that it can still be corrected so that it can truly uplift the criterions of life of the Filipino people and be the solution to decrease the country’s underemployment and flourishing population.
