Community Corrections Essay

Introduction:

1. Correctionss and the tools used to penalize and rehabilitate wrongdoers.
2. Introduce Community Corrections.
3. Introduce Thesis- A community corrections condemning scheme applies a scope of intermediate penalties and would break run into the demands of the penal system. convicted wrongdoers. and the community by take downing costs and prison overcrowding. while maintaining intermediate offense wrongdoers out of gaols and prisons.

Body Paragraphs:

1. How Community Corrections provides options to imprisonment. 2. How Community Corrections is designed to see both the safety of local occupants every bit good as the intervention and rehabilitation demands of the wrongdoer. 3. How Community Corrections reduces prison overcrowding.

4. How Community Corrections allows judges’ a more calibrated sentencing system that offers an choice of intermediate countenances including mulcts. community service. electronic monitoring. house apprehension. intensive probation and boot cantonments.

Decision: How a Community Corrections condemning scheme is effectual in its ability to assist rehabilitate wrongdoers and maintain prisons clear of intermediate wrongdoers.

Mention Page:
APA formatted mention page.

Using community corrections to better run into the demands of the penal system. convicted wrongdoers. and the community.

The United States correctional system serves two chief specific maps in relation to condemnable wrongdoers. The correctional system serves as a tool for penalizing wrongdoers and coercing the wrongdoer to pay for their offenses. it besides serves as a agency for rehabilitating wrongdoers and fixing them for successful reentry into society. The correctional system today uses probation. word. imprisonment. and the decease punishment to both punish and rehabilitate wrongdoers. A community corrections condemning scheme applies a scope of intermediate penalties and would break run into the demands of the penal system. convicted wrongdoers. and the community by maintaining intermediate offense wrongdoers out of gaols and prisons.

Community corrections describes plans that provide options to the imprisonment of wrongdoers in gaols or prisons. These plans include activities located in the same countries in which wrongdoers live and work. Community corrections options are designed to see both the safety of local occupants every bit good as the intervention and rehabilitation demands of the wrongdoer. Harmonizing to ( Morris & A ; Tonry. 1990 ) . a more comprehensive sentencing scheme that relies on a scope of intermediate penalties including ; mulcts. community service. intensive probation. and electronic monitoring would break run into the demands of the penal system. convicted wrongdoers. and the community.

Community corrections can be really good to the persons who are placed on probation in a sense that it gives them a 2nd opportunity to deliver their wrongs in society. ( Foster. Burk. 2006 ) . Community corrections vary from metropolis to metropolis and province to province. and were originally decentralized under the control of local tribunals. ( Foster. Burk. 2006 ) . Presently. community based options to prison are either province tally plans. or county tally plans subsidized by the province. Community corrections affect society in a figure of positive and negative ways. The positive consequence is that probation cuts down on prison and gaol costs. and can salvage 100s of 1000s of revenue enhancement remunerator dollars that it would be to feed and house wrongdoers if they were sentenced to prison or gaol. A negative consequence on society is that you candidly can non find whether. the student nurse or probationer will stay by the footings of release.

Most prisons are sing overcrowding. Several provinces in the South were ordered by federal authorization to either alleviate the overcrowding of the prison system or adapt to other signifiers of corrections ( Petersillia. 1998 ) . This created the construct of intermediate countenances. Intermediate countenances are the terminal consequence of the thought that imprisonment and probation are both used overly. ( Morris and Tonry. 1990 ) . It was argued that intermediate countenances could alleviate overcrowding. heighten public safety and rehabilitate wrongdoers while bring forthing cost economy to the legal powers that imposed them ( Petersillia. 1998 ) . ( Morris and Tonry. 1990 ) argued that imprisonment and probation are both used exceptionally. with a close emptiness of utile options in between.

They argued that Judgess should be allowed a more calibrated sentencing system that offers an choice of intermediate countenances including mulcts. community service. electronic monitoring. house apprehension. intensive probation and boot cantonments. This. they felt. was important as different penalties are viewed otherwise by assorted felons. Boot camp prisons were designed to alleviate the overcrowded prison system by cut downing the fiscal costs to the province with the secondary end of rehabilitating wrongdoers ( Mackenzie and Shaw. 1990 ) . ( Mackenzie and Shaw. 1990 ) found the bulk of boot cantonment participants showed stronger positive feelings about their prison experience and were more motivated about the possibility of personal alteration instead than those who served their sentence in traditional prisons.

( Hermes. 2008 ) stated. “From 1987 to 2007. the sum that states spent on corrections increased 127 per centum. more than six times the 21 per centum addition that states directed to higher instruction over the same period. harmonizing to the study. The study written from the Pew Center stated that. “the Pew Center on the States besides shows that additions in states’ corrections budgets are far exceling those for higher instruction. ” ( Hermes. 2008 ) . The study from the Pew Center besides showed that Connecticut. Delaware. Michigan. Oregon. and Vermont spend more on corrections than on higher instruction.

Correctionss disbursals are higher than of all time and are on the rise. If the corrections system does non alter it will go on to be provinces more and more every twelvemonth. Funding these prisons this manner takes money off from higher acquisition universities and colleges and the pupils of our hereafter. the clip for alteration is now. A community corrections condemning scheme is effectual in its ability to assist rehabilitate wrongdoers. maintain prisons clear of intermediate wrongdoers. all while functioning the community by take downing costs of prisons and go forthing room for the most violent wrongdoers out in the community.

Mention Page
Community Corrections. ( 2002 ) . In World of Criminal Justice. Gale. Retrieved from hypertext transfer protocol: //lib. kaplan. edu/login? url=/login? qurl=http: //www. credoreference. com. lib. kaplan. edu/entry/worldcrims/community_corrections.

Deschenes. E. & A ; Petersilia J. ( 1994 ) . What punishes? Inmates rank the badness of prison vs. intermediate countenances. Federal Probation. Vol. 58 Page: 3

Gale. ( 2008 ) . West’s Encyclopedia of American Law. Edition 2.
capital penalty

Hermes. J. J. ( 2008 ) . 5 States Spend More on Prisons Than on Colleges. Chronicle Of Higher Education. 54 ( 27 ) . A17.

Mackenzie. D. & A ; Shaw J. ( 1990 ) . Inmate Adjustment and Change during Shock Incarceration: The Impact of Correctional Boot Camp Programs” Justice Quarterly. Vol. 7: 1:125-150

Morris. N. . & A ; Tonry. M. ( 1990 ) . Between prison and probation: Intermediate penalties in a rational sentencing system. New York: Oxford University Press.

Pearson Education. Inc. ( 1995-2010 ) . Sentencing and the Correctional System Summary. Chapter 11.
Petersilia. J. ( 1998 ) . A Decade of Experimenting with Intermediate Sanctions: What Have We Learned” Federal Probation. 62:7-20.

Schwarzenegger. A. Governor ( 2010 ) . hypertext transfer protocol: //www. kpbs. org/news/2010/jan/08/overcrowded-and-expensive-governor-addresses-calif