Others may consider it a need. There are several arguments for why the TV could be considered a need. People need to know what is going on in the world. If people do not have a television, how would they get their news. Moreover, without news we would not know what was going on in the world, but some people just rely on the TV to warn them of weather emergencies. Like a television, a car is also a transportation necessary vehicle. People use cars to make money or to go wherever they want; nevertheless, some people use them as a luxury and valuable thing more than a life. Taking Bob’s situation in this essay is a typical example.
There's a specialist from your university waiting to help you with that essay.
Tell us what you need to have done now!
order now
He chose to keep his car for the financial security retirement to the rest of his life instead throw a switch that will divert the train down where his car is parked to save child’s life. I completely disagree with Bob’s decision. That is an unacceptable selfish act. If I could place myself in Bob’s situation, I would do whatever I could to save that child. Though knowing that that child does not relate to my intimate or my personal way. Suppose that if that child killed, what would happen to his parents? And if he were only one child in his family, how would his family suffer with the heavy loss?
In the hypothetical example, Bob was wrong because he could have – but did not – saves a innocent child life by scarifying his car, which he sees it as a luxury and is less valuable than the child’s life. Next, Singer gives a plan of saving our money to donate it to poor children overseas, and he writes, “The money you will spend at the restaurant could also help save the lives of children overseas! And what is one month’s dining out compared to a child’s life? Since there are a lot of desperately needy children in the world, there will always be another child whose life you could save for another $200” (Singer 406).
Suppose that if Singer’s plan works, the amount of lives saved that will be tremendous. By donating the money that we spend on their luxuries to oversea aid organizations, such as UNICEF to the people who need it. With that money, they could buy food, clean water, provided shelter, treat illnesses and many other products that are considered to be a necessity. In addiction to, he also raises practical questions unanswered make us think of them, and Singer states, “Is it the practical uncertainties about whether aid will really reach the people who need it?
Nobody who knows the world of oversea aid can doubt that such uncertainties exist” (Singer 405). There is one problem; however, I wonder how much of the money donated would actually reach the people it was intended for? Some organizations take advantage of a percentage for the donated money to cover administrative costs. In the light of this conclusion, Singer’s hypothetical example of Bob wakes up my mind and makes me ask myself if outside the world of oversea has such a hypothetical example like Bob. Nobody knows, but I am certain a thing that they could not sleep well with their selfish and immoral decision-making.
