A Review of the ‘Missional Church’

Church in North America

What is meant by “missional church” ? The term “missional church” has become a popular catch phrase over the past twosome of old ages. Some view missionary church as the latest church reclamation motion. [ 1 ] Others see missionary church as emergent church, which is a Christian motion to make the postmodern people with the Christian message. [ 2 ] Others consider missionary church as churches whose chief focal point are on stressing cross-cultural missions and directing as many missionaries to the foreign lands as possible. [ 3 ] While still others believe missionary church is merely a craze. [ 4 ] In this respect, Alan Roxburgh competently evaluates that the construct “missional church has gone from obscureness to platitude in eight short old ages and people still don’t know what it means.” [ 5 ] “What, so, would an apprehension of the church… look like if it were genuinely missionary in design and definition? ” [ 6 ]

In their book,Missionary Church: A Vision for the Sending of the Church in North America, Darrell L. Guder and five other writers seek to reply the aforesaid inquiry: “What, so, would an apprehension of the church… look like if it were genuinely missionary in design and definition? ” This book challenges the readers to rethink the nature and mission of the church in relationship with God’s being. Furthermore, the writers require the cardinal reorientation of the church based on the mission of God. For them, “mission is non simply an activity of the church. Rather, mission is the consequence of God’s enterprise, rooted in God’s intents to reconstruct and mend creation.” [ 7 ] This understanding leads the writers to specify the missionary church as a sent entity instead than merely a directing one. Grounded in such a missionary hermeneutic of the Bible, the thesis of this book is that the church is by its really nature a organic structure of people sent by God on a mission. The writers point out that many Christians are so focussed on the mission of the church without first understanding God’s being and mission that they tend to concentrate on what missionary churches do, and that the missionary church conversation, nevertheless, should get down with who God is and what the church is in relationship with God’s bureau. [ 8 ]

The intent of this paper is to critically reexamine Guder’s attack toward understanding what it means to be a missionary church. Specifically, this paper foremost briefly summarizes the subjects of the book and examine its features. Next, the referee inspects the major strengths and failings of the book and the construct of missionary church. Finally, the referee ends with discoursing some issues refering ecclesiology and mission based on a critical review-reflection onMissionary Church.

1. Summary and Characteristics of the Book

This book is from research of the Gospel and Our Culture Network. The Network emerged in North America in the late eightiess as the continuance of the Gospel and civilization treatment initiated by Lessile Newbigin’s Hagiographas. [ 9 ] The Gospel and Our Culture Network particularly probed a new construct,missionary churchin order to discourse the church’s individuality and mission theologically. In this book, the six subscribers bring missiological penetrations to bear on the altering context of North America. They, foremost of all, discourse the elaborate characteristics of post-modern North American civilization and the feature of the church in that civilization. They argue, “North American religionism is going more pluralistic, more individualistic, and more private.” [ 10 ] The church besides became a seller of assorted spiritual services to pull people and “so accommodated to the American manner of life that they churches are now domesticated.” [ 11 ] As a consequence, the writers hold that North America is a “mission field.” [ 12 ] They so call for churches to reassess their topographic point within the prevalent civilization and supply an option, which “unlearns old forms and learns new ways of life that reveal God’s transforming and mending power.” [ 13 ]

In order to enable the established church to go a missionary church, the writers propose the church to face three cardinal challenges: ( 1 ) independent ego, ( 2 ) privatized spiritual religion, and ( 3 ) relativized positions. To get the better of these barriers, they offer concrete counsel that the churches must retrieve what it means to be communities of God’s reign, detect what it means to move on behalf of God’s reign within the public life, and speak meekly Jesus’ kingdom truth and love. [ 14 ] In add-on, the transmutation of the established church into a missionary church calls for a new paradigm of pastoral leading. The writers assert that a professionalized clergy with pastor-teacher accomplishments is non sufficient for missionary communities. [ 15 ] Rather, leaders who value cultivating religious subjects of a common life are needed in missionary communities. Furthermore, going a missionary church requires extremist alteration in our apprehension of church rank. The bing construct of rank implies inactive engagement and does non adequately reflect the dynamic nature of mission. They so suggest that everyone is invited to fall in the centered community on the journey that is traveling with Christ toward God’s promised fulfilment: “The biblical formation of the community should root deeply the sense of the community as aliens and foreigners, people on the route toward the consummation of the kingdom.” [ 16 ]

All things considered, this book is most valuable for the undermentioned features: ( 1 ) it provides Trinitarian position of mission in connexion with ecclesiology ; [ 17 ] ( 2 ) it helps understand the modern-day civilization ; [ 18 ] ( 3 ) it offers missionary individuality of the church, that is, the church must be apostolic and missionary ; [ 19 ] and ( 4 ) it suggests a new paradigm of missionary community and leading: Everyone would be welcome and invited to fall in the community on the journey. [ 20 ] Overall, the book provides a thorough review of the church today and a call to reinvent the church in visible radiation of its mission to the new cultural context. When it comes to consonance and disagreement of the construct of ‘missionary church,’ Dave Harvey in his session “Watch Your Mission: To Be, or Not to Be, ‘Missional, ” gives an overview of the missionary movement’s strengths and failings. Here is the bosom of his lineation [ 21 ] : ( 1 ) What are the strengths of Missional churches? A. Missional churches have a applaudable passion for evangelism ; B. Missional churches have a commendable committedness to piquant civilization ; C. Missional churches have a good urge for reviewing church tradition ; D. They besides possess an admirable devotedness to societal impact. ( 2 ) What are the failings of Missional churches? A. Missional churches tend to be mission-centered instead than gospel-centered ; B. Missional churches tend to hold a reductionistic ecclesiology ; C. Missional churches tend to confound cultural battle with cultural submergence ; D. Missional churches tend to understate the institutional and organisational nature of the Church ; E. Missional churches tend to hold an deficient apprehension of apostolic ministry. Consequently,Missionary Churchnowadayss a ambitious vision, yet at the same clip deserves a discerning analysis if implemented.

2. Strengths & A ; Failings

The writers justly point out that mission is internal to the church. That is, the church is missionary. [ 22 ] This book successfully proposes us to review all of our premises about the nature and pattern of the church. Furthermore, it trenchantly challenges our apprehension of ‘mission.’ What leaves the referee much to be desired, nevertheless, is the deficiency of account for the construct of ‘being sent.’ The writers remark that ‘being sent’ is a specifying component of the church from scriptural, historical, contextual, eschatological, and practical points of position. [ 23 ] But it seems that house exegetical support is needed that the New Testament conceives of the church this manner. In add-on, what is missing in this book is that the writer does non propose inside informations of what all this means for curates and laic people in local folds. For illustration, the writers do non state the difference between mission as being and mission as engagement. Even though the writers attempt to supply a theological and scriptural background for a new ecclesiological apprehension, they do non offer the readers practical suggestions or concrete illustrations as to what the missionary church would look like if implemented. Furthermore, the writers seem to discredit of import constructs like wickedness, grace, and sanctity. They argue that these are ruled out by the current context as irrelevant. [ 24 ] In fact, these constructs are still cardinal subjects to the civilization and readily apprehensible. The referee would state that Christians need such metanarrative constructs to transform the whole context.

With respect to thesis development, the writers develop the thesis convincingly supplying utile treatments of corollary alterations needed in pastoral ministry and constructions for local and planetary mission. However, the statements pertinent to missionary constructions for local and planetary mission seem to be weakened by being treated in chapters 8 and 9. The writers posit that local religion communities are responsible for the local mission and have all authorization for mission. They so insist that all local mission communities are closely connected in a community of communities in mission. The writer should hold been set forthing how the planetary mission can work in the context of the local religion communities.

3. Reasoning ideas: towards a divinity of mission

Missionary Churchemphasizes the church’s sent-ness, specifying the church as an instrument of God’s mission. On the footing of themissio Deiconstruct and with the acknowledgment of North America as mission field, the individuality of the church is identified as a missionary community called and sent into the universe for God’s cosmopolitan mission. In peculiar, being sent means the church lives in the universe culturally and geographically, but “not of the world.” [ 25 ] In this sense, the church’s mission is non merely to present the Gospel in a culturally relevant manner, but besides “to point beyond that civilization to the civilization of God’s new community.” [ 26 ] The church as a informant to the Gospel engages in the universe in a manner that the church serves as an alternate community. This image of the church is found in the scriptural description of a “holy state, ” “the salt of the Earth, the visible radiation of the universe, and a metropolis set on a hill.” [ 27 ] These scriptural images emphasize the church’s mission as ‘being.’ The church’s mission flows out of this self-understanding.

Therefore, the missionary church is a low, but exciting call for the church to re-examine itself in visible radiation of God’s being. As the writers point out, in bend, the reply to the crisis of the North American church is non a methodological issue, but a theological one: [ 28 ] the church itself is non the end of mission, it is an instrument of God’s cosmopolitan mission ; the church is called to take part in the mission of God. [ 29 ]

Bibliography

Bevans, Stephen B. and Roger Schroeder. Constants in Context: A Theology of Mission for Today / Stephen B. Bevans, Roger P. Schroeder American Society of Missiology Series: No. 30: Maryknoll, N.Y. : Orbis Books, c2004. , 2004.

Bosch, David Jacobus. Transforming Mission: Paradigm Shifts in Theology of Mission / David J. Bosch American Society of Missiology Series: No. 16: Maryknoll, N.Y. : Orbis Books, c1991. , 1991.

Goheen, Michael W. “ Historical Perspectives on the Missional Church Movement: Probing Lesslie Newbigin’s Formative Influence. ” Trinity Journal for Theology & A ; Ministry, ( 2010 ) .

Guder, Darrell L. and Lois Barrett. Missional Church: A Vision for the Sending of the Church in North America / Darrell L. Guder, Project Coordinator and Editor ; Lois Barrett… [ Et Al. ] The Gospel and Our Culture Series: Grand Rapids, Mich. : W.B. Eerdmans Pub. , c1998. , 1998.

Kimball, Dan. The Emerging Church: Vintage Christianity for New Generations / Dan Kimball ; with Commentary by Rick Warren… [ Et Al. ] : Grand Rapids, Mich. : Zondervan, c2003.

Ott, Craig, Stephen J. Strauss and Timothy C. Tennent. Encountering Theology of Mission: Biblical Foundations, Historical Developments, and Contemporary Issues / Craig Ott, Stephen J. Strauss ; with Timothy C. Tennent Encountering Mission: Grand Rapids, Mich. : Baker Academic, c2010. , 2010.

Roxburgh, Alan J. , Mark Priddy and M. Scott Boren. Introducing the Missionary Church: What It Is, Why It Matters, How to Become One / Alan J. Roxburgh and M. Scott Boren ; General Editor, Mark Priddy Allelon Missional Series: Grand Rapids, Mich. : Baker Books, c2009. , 2009.

Van Gelder, Craig. The Missional Church and Denominations: Helping Congregations Develop a Missional Identity Missional Church Series: Grand Rapids, Mich. : William B. Eerdmans Pub. Co. , , 2008.

Van Gelder, Craig and Dwight J. Zscheile. The Missional Church in Perspective: Mapping Trends and Determining the Conversation. Grand Rapids, Mich: Baker Academic, 2011.