1. Leroy may be the victim of disregard as there is grounds that his parents are persistently neglecting to run into his basic physical and psychological demands and that this is likely to do damage to his wellness and development. HM Government ( 2006 ) . Maccoby and Martin ( 1983 ) assert that a kid may endure disregard if that child’s needs organize a low precedence within the household unit. In add-on to pretermit. Leroy may good be the sing emotional maltreatment. Emotional maltreatment involves the “persistent ill-treatment of a kid such as to do terrible and relentless consequence on their emotional development. ” HM Government ( 2006:39 ) . This may include conveying a feeling of ineptitude ; being unloved ; inappropriate outlooks of a child’s ability or degree of duty. which are out of kelter with that child’s age and phase and being informant to the ill-treatment and maltreatment of others.
2. Leroy’s demeanour appears to hold changed since his return to school from his summer interruption. For over half a term it has been noticed that Leroy is quieter than usual ; he has lost involvement in his school assignment and playing with his friends at break clip. When he is approached. by friends he reacts sharply. It is noted that he is frequently tired and sometimes falls asleep during categories. Leroy’s fabrics and his personal hygiene are of peculiar concern. when questioned about his personal hygiene Leroy states that. there is ne’er any hot H2O in the house or anyone to watch him bathe. Leroy frequently forgets his tiffin and has been seen taking nutrient from classmate’s tiffin boxes.
There's a specialist from your university waiting to help you with that essay.
Tell us what you need to have done now!
order now
He complains of being hungry and non holding any nutrient at place. Leroy’s female parent has seldom been seen since the start of the new term. In an impulsive visit Leroy’s female parent came to the school to discourse her matrimonial jobs. which have been ongoing since the summer interruption. She explains that her and Leroy’s father have separated and that he has left the household place. She goes on to explicate that since the separation she has been enduring from depression and has been prescribed anti-depressants by her GP and is happening it really hard to get by with life in general. She admits to allowing Leroy and his three siblings look after themselves. with small supervising. Leroy and his siblings have non had contact with their male parent since the separation.
3. I am aware that Leroy’s female parent has attended the school without petition. I would be understanding and suggest that we discuss ab initio what the school could make to assist. I would explicate that I was concerned for Leroy’s well-being and felt that a farther meeting should be arranged with her consent to discourse a program traveling frontward.
4. I would enter my observations and conversations instantly and log my concern with the school’s Designated Safeguarding Person. The DSG would originate a Common Assessment Framework meeting to see Leroy and his siblings would acquire the extra support necessary.
5. Leroy’s female parent would profit from sing her local Children’s Centre where she could entree extra support from an out-reach worker. Advise Leroy’s female parent to book an assignment with her GP to discourse her medicine demands. The school could supply school dinners and lavishing installations in the short term. ( 536 words )
Mentions
HM Government ( 2006 ) . Working Together to Safeguard Children. London: HMSO
Maccoby. E. E. . & A ; Martin. J. A. ( 1983 ) Socialization in the context of the household: Parent-child interaction’ . In Macleod-Brudenall. I and Kay. J. ( 2008 ) . Advanced Early Old ages For Foundation Degrees and Levels 4/5. 2nd Edn. Harlow: Heinemann Publications.
Pettican. K. ( 1998 ) . ‘Child protection. public assistance and the jurisprudence. Chapter 10 in Taylor J. and Wood. M. Early Childhood Studies. London: Arnold
