Does perceptual experience of world affects our beliefs? It may be said that an person ‘s perceptual experience of world depends on one ‘s environment, society and experiences. No one individual is indistinguishable to another and no two people portion the same perceptual experience of world. This is merely because their idea forms, mental capacity and their lives are non precisely the same. Therefore, beliefs or any patterns associating to personal consciousness of the organic structure and of a higher religious connexion are strictly a signifier of ego positions. The application of spiritualty in society has become hierarchical and many had taken on mass philosophies that adhere to the larger community. Authenticity of the faith and its religious connexion tend to flex with the modern attack. Such that anyone come ining the “ mass spiritual community ” faces the necessity of flinging old beliefs in order to suit in and be accepted or refused and be denounced by the greater mass. In discoursing the function of faith as a ruling force in society, it can be expected that faith is a signifier of personal accomplishment through religious waking up that can actuate and reenforce people ‘s sense of committedness to life. Whether it may be a personal pick or encouraged by others, the religious consciousness combines both cultural sensitiveness and power representation to keep the footing that faith is a signifier of private civilization. This force can be either conserving or jumping but the foundation lies in its ability to pass on a sense of world that goes beyond the mundane common-sense.
I watched Mai go through her day-to-day rites of cleaning, offering alms to the divinities and was lucky plenty to witness a meeting with a visitant. I ‘m non certain if Mai realistically goes through everything that she did for me every twenty-four hours but she explained that it takes about 2 proceedingss for every supplication at each communion table and because she has over 50 communion tables, it would be quite clip devouring. I so asked her what her normal modus operandi would be, I learned that she offers one long supplication enduring about 10 proceedingss to all the divinities while illuming incenses. She so gives an excess supplication to the ascendants and Buddha himself inquiring for protection and counsel. She does this twice a twenty-four hours and praying at all communion tables merely during particular occasions or vacations. The unusual thing is that Mai non merely chants Buddhist supplications but she besides sings anthem and mantras in her rituals- a combination of several different linguistic communications. This is of class non in conformity with traditional patterns and Mai does n’t look to experience like she needed to follow set philosophies when it comes to her methods.
I was able to listen in to the meeting that she had with her visitant, although she did asked me to maintain it private. In maintaining with my research I am able to depict the adult male to be in his early 30s, who had gone through some problem and now worries that he wo n’t be able to travel on to the hereafter ; his concerns is based on the perceptual experience that he can non pattern faith because of his past evildoings. His moral consciousness came approximately after a realisation that his actions will compromise his opportunity of transmigrating as a homo in the following life – such as the belief that homo is the highest signifier of being and merely the purest can transmigrate back. What he truly fears is godly penalty or “ the Godhead purpose, non chiefly retaliatory, but instead hindrance, to deter evildoing by fright of penalty ; and reform school, to mend, polish, to do pure by affliction ( Heschel, 1969 ) . ” In Western society, this construct had been about and although non everyone believes concretely in Heaven and Hell or even the hereafter it has become a societal norm. From the structural-functional paradigm, the societal map of godly penalty has become a construction of judgement by others- people finally observe each other for the feature of a “ good ” or “ bad ” individual.
In practical activities, Malinowski argues that “ faith is non born of out of guess… but instead out of the existent calamities of human life, out of struggle between human programs and worlds ( 1948 ) . ” The battles of life give manner to the demand of something more powerful as a representation so that people will hold something more profound to populate for. This perceptual experience that world is based on whether or non a individual would see Heaven or Hell is of class a personal belief- in the sense that a individual lives life strictly and sacrifice worldly goods for a better opportunity subsequently on. The negative is that this can really take to devaluating the clip on Earth by guaranting that people ever fear the effects of their lives and populating for the following one alternatively of using to the present. Furthermore, the adult male ‘s strong belief defined his frights and because of this he intangibly reinstated his beliefs by inquiring for religious advice, non from a spiritual functionary but through a psychic, a individual straddling two realms- world and the unknown. Questions that institutionalised faith can non supply which gives an excessive grade of power to religious diverseness.
Mai ‘s combination of faiths and other signifiers of religious patterns incorporate two universes that frequently come caput to caput with each other. This attack is interesting because it highlights my initial thought that faith had become a more personal pattern and that people prefer private devotedness. This is different than Durkheim ‘s statement in sing faith as a communal experience. His thought that spiritual experiences have two different differentiations, the profane and the sacred, is a small contradictory in that mundane activities reflect the transcendent when representations really occur at about every degree ( 1912 ) . Mai had an country dedicated to several Hindu divinities every bit good as several of Christ crucifixion ; she claimed are necessary in protection since all divinities inhabit the same religious plane. Geertz ‘s thought that faith is a system of familial constructs that expressed in symbolic signifiers by agencies in which people perpetuate, communicate and developed the attitude towards life helps me to see the enticement of taking something sacred and conveying it down to the degree of mundane utility ( 1966 ) .
In regard, Mai ‘s place is a symbolic universe – a set of beliefs that everyone is familiar with- which aims to do an institutionalised construction plausible for a individual whether they agreed or non with the logic ( Berger and Luckmann, 1966 ) . In taking different facets of faith from several different civilizations and uniting them in a topographic point that is unfastened to all spiritual artefacts and thoughts, Mai has objectified her ain sets of beliefs that are interchangeable between the mundane and the more structured ways of idolizing. Her reading of faith is the altering variable and her perceptual experience of world is what dictates her religious consciousness through the creative activity of her personal sacred infinite.