Closed Or Traditional Innovation Management Essay

The aim of this research is to obtain a better apprehension of the possibilities and impossiblenesss that Small to Medium Enterprises ( SMEs ) in the Dutch IT-services industry face when seeking to implement unfastened invention. A deficiency of absorbent capacity is presented as a possible barrier for these SMEs to implement unfastened invention successfully. Firms progressively build invention capacity by tapping into external cognition beginnings ( Chesbrough, 2003 ; Laursen and Salter, 2006 ) . At the same clip, it is widely accepted that critical cognition is non ever easy available through external beginnings ( Argote, 1999 ) , which fosters a demand for making cognition internally ( Nonaka, 1994 ) . However, with regard to both manners of cognition sourcing, the capacity to absorb cognition has become important ( volberda, et. al. , 2009 ) . To accomplish a better apprehension, first Lashkar-e-Taiba ‘s focal point on some of the theories that have shaped this research.

KNOWLEDGEBASED Position:

The cognition based position claims that cognition is the most of import strategic resource that a house has at its disposal. Its protagonists argue that because cognition based resources are frequently hard to copy and get, holding a heterogenous cognition base is a major determiner of deriving a sustainable competitory advantage. The premise is that houses should be seen as heterogenous packages of mostly silent cognition assets ; houses engage in a specialisation procedure based on cognitive restraints ( Gentile-Ludecke and Giroud 2009 ) . This position is supported by Grant ( 2006 ) who states that “ Knowledge is the most strategically of import among a house ‘s resources ” . This is farther supported by the statement that the competitory advantage of the houses can non be unambiguously attributed to internal resources but besides depends on resources and capablenesss externally acquired ( Squire, Cousins, and Brown 2008 ) .

This cognition is embedded and carried through multiple entities including organisational civilization and individuality, policies, modus operandis, paperss, systems, and employees. Originating from the strategic direction literature, this position builds upon and extends the resource-based position of the house ab initio promoted by Penrose ( 1959 ) and subsequently expanded by others ( Wernerfelt 1984, Barney 1991, Conner 1991 ) .

The usage of externally acquired cognition can take to competitory advantages and enhanced advanced public presentation ( Gentile-Ludecke and Giroud 2009 ) .Therefore, organisations that seek to heighten their cognition base get cognition from external entities. This does nevertheless show some troubles, as Spender ( 1996 ) states ; “ Firm-specific, intangible, non-tradable, and inimitable cognition is the lone lasting beginning of sustainable competitory advantage of the house ” , it is at the really least hard, to merchandise and interchange cognition between houses and/or stakeholders.

One of the theoretical accounts that attempts to accomplish this, is the Open Innovation ( OI ) theoretical account. To acquire a better apprehension of unfastened invention, first we take a expression at the closed invention theoretical account, besides known as traditional invention.

Closed or traditional invention:

Traditionally, houses have relied on perpendicular integrating where internal R & A ; D activities lead to internally developed new merchandises and services that are so distributed by the house ( Chesbrough et al. , 2006 ) . In this alleged ‘closed invention theoretical account ‘ houses hired the best research workers and applied scientists for the engineering involved ( Dittrich & A ; Duysters, 2007 ) , and therefore, invention chiefly took topographic point within the house. In add-on, this invention theoretical account argues that successful invention requires control and ownership of the rational belongings ( Chesbrough, 2003b ) , and hence, houses should command the creative activity and direction of new thoughts by themselves.

For most of the twentieth century, the closed invention theoretical account worked good. Firms invested more to a great extent in internal research & A ; development than their rivals and they hired the best research workers and applied scientists ( Chesbrough, 2003c ) . Due to these investings they were able to detect the best and greatest figure of thoughts, which allowed them to acquire to the market foremost ( Chesbrough, 2003c ) .

In add-on, houses, such as General Electric, established cardinal research labs to place and commercialize a assortment of new merchandises and/or services ( Chesbrough, 2003c ) . Therefore, they could harvest most of the net incomes, which they protected by sharply commanding their Information science in order to forestall rivals from working it ( Chesbrough, 2003c ) . Furthermore, they could reinvest net incomes in transporting out more R & A ; D, which so led to extra discovery finds, making a virtuous rhythm of invention ( Chesbrough, 2003c ) .

The term invention has become a popular term in concern and is so widely used its significance has become slightly bleary ( Skarzynski & A ; Gibson, 2008 ) . Therefore, foremost a differentiation must be made between invention and innovation. Where innovation is the first visual aspect of an thought for a new merchandise, procedure, etc. The invention is the first effort to set the innovation into practise ( Fagerberg et al, 2004. ) , or as Hauschildt and Salomo ( 2011 ) depict it “ entirely arising an thought is non sufficient, instead the commercialisation of the invention makes the concluding and decisive part towards an invention ” . Innovation is non a individual action but a procedure which composed of sub-processes ( Myers and Marquis, 1969 ) . In order to successfully implement an invention it therefore becomes necessary for the house to hold a big figure of accomplishments such as merchandise and production cognition, market research, human and fiscal resources and so on. This already creates a polar function for the construct of absorbent capacity, a function which is farther multiplied in the unfastened invention theoretical account as we will depict subsequently.

Myers and Marquis ( 1969 ) province that invention is a continous procedure, it is hence alluring to see invention as non merely continous, but besides as liniear with research followed development, so production followed by marketing. This liniear theoretical account is nevertheless inaccurate ( Kline and Rosenberg, 1986 ) as it does non take into history the feedback and failures that occur during any invention proces ensuing in a figure of cringles in the procedure. Chesbrough ( 2003 ) gives the theoretical account below as a representation for the closed invention theoretical account and pictures it as a liniear, continous procedure. When sing this theoretical account we must maintain in head the failures, feedback and ensuing cringles as described by Kline and Rosenberg ( 1986 ) .

Beginning: Chesbrough ( 2003 )

The closed invention procedure steadfastly sets the boundaries of the house, leting for small to no external cognition or histrions to hold an impact on the invention procedure.

Open Innovation ( OI ) :

“ Not all the smart people are working for us ” ( Chesbrough, 2003 ) , with this celebrated quote the religious male parent of the unfastened invention theoretical account sums up the nucleus of the ground why unfastened invention can be more successful than the traditional invention theoretical account. Further motive for the usage of the unfastened invention theoretical account can be found in the increased uncertainness that houses face and the rapid velocity of technological alteration ( Vinding, 2000 ) . The theoretical account of unfastened invention promises a greater return on advanced activities and their rational belongings ( IP ) by loosening control over both ( West, 2006 ) . The unfastened invention paradigm is frequently contrasted to the traditional perpendicular integrating or “ proprietary ” theoretical account where internal R & A ; D activities lead to merchandises that are developed and distributed by the house ( Chandler, A.D. , 1990 ) . In Open Invention houses commercialize external ( every bit good as internal ) thoughts by deploying outside ( every bit good as in-house ) pathways to the market ( Chesbrough, H.W. , 2003 ) .

Beginning: Chesbrough ( 2003 )

Open invention in hazard loaded activities such as corporate venturing has the undermentioned advantages: ( I ) benefits from early engagement in new engineerings or concern chances ; ( two ) delayed fiscal committedness ; ( three ) early issues cut downing the downward losingss ; and ( four ) delayed issue in instance it spins off a venture ( Van Haverbeke, W. et Al, 2008 ) . Depending on its concern theoretical account, a house decides whether or non external and internal cognition is valuable to be farther developed and commercialized into a new concern. When the venture undertaking is expected non to be profitable plenty or when it does non suit a house ‘s concern theoretical account, the house will non merely abort the undertaking ( as in the closed invention model ) , but it will seek to licence or to sell it to other houses who can utilize the invention fruitfully because they have different concern theoretical accounts ( Van Haverbeke, W. et Al, 2008 ) .

Open invention offers houses the advantage of an early issue, and the ability to recognize some value from undertakings that do non travel frontward internally. At the same clip, unfastened invention allows houses to profit from detaining an issue. The creative activity of corporate ventures that reside outside the organisation allows houses to supervise its developments while detaining the issue determination ( Van Haverbeke, W. et Al, 2008 ) . The possibility of recognizing value from a undertaking that will non be completed means that the negative effects of an issue are reduced and hence allows for increased investing in hazardous inventions.

However unfastened invention is non without its hazards. There is for case the hazard of allowing the errors that the provider of your unfastened invention has made. This can even include the usage of patented IP resulting in cases. A premier illustration of this is exemplified by SCO ‘s case impeaching Linux subscribers of stealing copyrighted beginning codification from SCO ‘s proprietary Unix execution ( West and Gallagher, 2006 ) . There have even been suggestions that unfastened beginning undertakings have been intentionally sabotaged in this mode ( Cargill and Bolin, 2004 ) . Another key job despite the quality of cognition obtained is that houses incorporating internal and external inventions can confront higher coordination costs and hazards than if all activities were internalized if the house is non prepared or suited to incorporate the external cognition ( West and Gallagher, 2006 ) .

To recognize Open Innovation a figure of internal demands have been identified.

Absorbent capacity. The being of external cognition provides no benefits to the house if the house can non place the relevant cognition and integrate it into its invention activities. This requires scanning, absorbent capacity, and besides the political willingness to integrate external invention ( West, J. & A ; Gallagher, S. , 2006 ) .

Motivation to portion. Prior unfastened invention research assumes that external beginnings of invention will originate. To day of the month this has clearly been true. However, external beginnings of invention are supplied by some individual or entity. How can houses work to see that this watercourse of external invention is replenished? Why would houses lend IP that was traveling to be made available to their challengers ( West, J. & A ; Gallagher, S. , 2006 ) ?

Therefore, to work efficaciously, houses that adapt to the unfastened invention attack have to develop new accomplishments, modus operandis and schemes determination ( Van Haverbeke, W. et Al, 2008 ) . The acquisition of cognition implies the transportation of cognition from an external entity, but it does non automatically increase the cognition base ; organisations benefit from externally acquired cognition merely when it becomes integrated with their bing stock of cognition ( Grant 1996 ) . Firms learn about new engineerings and chances by doing little learning stairss. This accretion of absorbent capacity over clip is an of import stipulation for an effectual and efficient choice of options. By bit by bit bettering its absorbent capacity, houses gain cognition about the future potency of the undertakings. When a follow-on investing determination has to be made, this cognition is necessary to choose the best options in front ( Van Haverbeke et al. , 2008 ) . Therefore absorbent capacity is indispensable to implementing an unfastened invention scheme within the house.

Absorbent capacity

In their survey on international engineering transportation, Kedia and Bhagat ( 1988 ) foremost coined the term

“ absorbent capacity ” . However, the part by Cohen and Levinthal ( 1990 ) is by and large accepted as the establishing paper where they define absorbent capacity as a firm-level concept. Since so a batch of theoretical and empirical surveies have been devoted to foster our apprehension of absorbent capacity in the house. With some research workers taking the construct from the house degree and spread outing it to the person up to the state degree ( Van Den Bosch et al. , 2003 ; Narula, 2004 ) . This flexibleness in the construct is non merely shown on this degree but besides means that it has proven to be applicable for many Fieldss of research such as strategic direction, industrial administration, international concern, and engineering direction ( Zahra and George 2002 ) .

With the broad assortment of application of the construct, one would about anticipate there to be uncertainness about its specific characteristics. However, absorbent capacity has been used in most instances as a house ‘s ability to “ place, absorb and work cognition from the environment ” ( Cohen and Levinthal, 1989 ; p. 569 ) . This definition is farther supported by Schmidt ( 2005 ) who states that the three constituents of absorbent capacity are “ designation, assimilation and development of external cognition within the house ” . In kernel, absorbent capacity is the house ‘s capableness to cover with external cognition. There has been some treatment as to whether there are more than three constituents, designation, assimilation and development to specify absorbent capacity. For illustration Zahra and George ( 2002 ) add transmutation of cognition to the definition whilst retaining the three other constituents. Even though this is an interesting add-on, it can be said that transmutation of cognition is an indispensable portion of the development of cognition. After all, without a successful transmutation of cognition there can be no successful development of cognition.

There is some uncertainness about how to mensurate absorbent capacity within the house. A big figure of different attacks have been used in the yesteryear. These include R & A ; D budgets, -stocks, and -intensities ( Belderbos et al. , 2004 ; Cassiman and Veugelers, 2002 ; Oltra and Flor, 2003 ; Stock et al. , 2001 ) , following up on the statements presented by Cohen and Levinthal ( 1989 ) . Other placeholders and steps ( chiefly used by research workers from the field of concern disposal ) include organisational construction and patterns, like incentive systems and human resource and cognition direction, ( Lenox and King, 2004 ; Van Den Bosch et al. , 1999 ; Vinding, 2000 ) .

Follow up and construction

The importance of absorbent capacity in ( unfastened ) invention is clear, there is nevertheless a deficit of research to find the grade of absorbent capacity in SMEs. The aim of this research is to research the being of absorbent capacity in SMEs in the Dutch ICT-sector. This research will hold an explorative nature as small to no research has as of yet been done in this field. Furthermore, there is a deficiency of direct empirical measurings of absorbent capacity ( Schmidt, 2005 ) .

Chapter 2 will supply a more in-depth expression at absorbent capacity and will province a figure of propositions. Chapter 3 will supply a description of the methodological analysis used in this research where chapters 4 and 5 will province the decisions and recommendations for farther research in the hereafter.

Further definition of footings

To come to a more focused and therefore executable research it is necessary to find a specific mark group on which to concentrate the remainder of the research. First of wholly, this research will be limited to Dutch SMEs that are registered in the Dutch chamber of commercialism ( Kamer van Koophandel ) . Furthermore this research will be focussed on the IT services industry. This because the sector is good known for non merely the demand, but besides the willingness to introduce.

Small and moderate-sized endeavors ( SMEs )

SMEs are defined otherwise by the EU and The Netherlands. For the intent of this research, the definition that will be used will be that of The Netherlands. This means that a concern with either less than 100 employees or an one-year turnover below a‚¬ 23.000.000 is considered an SME. Unfortunately, given the legal signifier of most SMEs, finding turnover is hard. To besiege this job, merely companies that have up to 100 employees are considered portion of the mark group for this research.

( Roth, M. , 2011 )

IT services industry

The Dutch authorities uses SBI-codes ( Standaard Bedrijfsindeling ) to distinguish between the activities of endeavors. SBI-code 62 relates to companies that are active in the IT industry and is defined as Servicess and activities in the country of Information engineering ( beginning: www.cbs.nl 23-6-2012 ) .

Uniting the standard of SMEs and the SBI-code 62 gives us the sum of mark endeavors for this research. The information is provided by the Dutch Chamber of Commerce ( Kamer van Koophandel ) .

1 -10 employees

11-50 employees

51-100 employees

Enterprises

36.740

1.500

190

Figures based on informations supplied by www.statline.nl, 1 January 2012.

To guarantee comparison between the research subjects, merely research topics that are active in SBI group 6201 which relates to companies that develop, produce and publish package.

Chapter 2 absorbent capacity in deepness

In chapter 1 an debut to the function of absorbent capacity in unfastened invention was presented. In chapter 1 it is besides said that whilst R & A ; D plays an of import portion in developing and making absorbent capacity ( Belderbos et al. , 2004 ; Cassiman and Veugelers, 2002 ; Oltra and Flor, 2003 ; Stock et al. , 2001 ) , there is besides a function for Human resources and single accomplishments & A ; cognition every bit good as the Company construction ( Lenox and King, 2004 ; Van Den Bosch et al. , 1999 ; Vinding, 2000 ) . The following measure will be to look at these three different constituents in bend and hence acquire a better apprehension of them.

Research & A ; Development

The First component that will be looked at is Research & A ; Development ( R & A ; D ) , traditionally the most normally known factor in finding the step of absorbent capacity. It is hence besides the most looked at, nevertheless small research has been found with respects to finding absorbent capacity through R & A ; D in SMEs.

In their pioneering articles on Absorptive Capacity, Cohen and Levinthal ( 1990, 1994 ) contend ‘that the ability of a house to acknowledge the value of new, external information, assimilate it, and use it to commercial terminals is critical to its advanced capablenesss ‘ ( Cohen and Levinthal, 1990 ) . In their preparations, absorbent capacity is a comparatively compact thought that links acquisition and invention, and maintains that ‘Fortune Favours the Prepared Firm ‘ . Although the possibility of other options is mentioned, their basic statement Centres on battle in Research and Development as a agency for administrations to bolster their absorbent capacity and hence their fight. This is visualized in Figure 1 where “ Own R & A ; D ” does n ot merely profit the “ inventions ” but besides increases absorbent capacity, which in bend has a positive consequence on “ Interfirm acquisition of cognition ” .

Figure 1. Model of absorbent capacity and R & A ; D inducements.

Beginning: Cohen and Levinthal ( 1990 )

Therefore, while R & A ; D evidently generates inventions, it besides develops the house ‘s ability to place, absorb and work cognition from the environment ( Cohen and Levinthal, 1989 ) .

This is confirmed by Bosch, Volberda and De Boer ( 1999 ) whose their chief statement is that the larning potency for absorbent capacity is chiefly determined by prior related cognition and R & A ; D investings, labelled as the “ cumulativeness characteristic ” by Cohen and Levinthal. Many empirical surveies support this ( recursive ) impression of absorbent capacity ( Ahuja, 2000 ; Cockburn and Henderson, 1998 ; Lane and Lubatkin, 1998 ; Lyles and Salk, 1996 ; Mowery et al. , 1996 ; Writings and Harianto, 1992 ; Pisano, 1994 ; Powell et al. , 1996 ; Shane, 2000 ; Stuart, 1998 ; Tsai, 2001 ) .

Gambardella ( 1992 ) found grounds from 14 instance surveies of big US drug industries utilizing patent informations as the end product index. Firms who are in a place of better in-house scientific capablenesss ( measured as scientific publications ) are able non merely to do more efficient usage of internal cognition but besides to work more efficaciously external cognition. This is in line with Henderson and Cuckburn ( 1996 ) , who found similar consequences of big houses in pharmaceuticals and Arora & A ; Gambardella ( 1990 ) in biotechnology.

However, non all empirical research supports the premise of R & A ; D being a determiner

of absorbent capacity ( Lane and Lubatkin 1998 ) . Absorbent capacity is cumulative in its nature and accretion will allow a more efficient accretion in the following period because of already accumulated some cognition in that field therefore easier to absorb new cognition. Therefore the being of a certain degree of cognition in that peculiar way will therefore supply better signals to foretell and import new technological chances, which is particularly of import in unsure environments ( Vinding, 2000 ) . The house further increases the attraction to spouses and therefore increase the house ‘s coaction chances ( Ahuja 2000 ) . Mangematin et. Al. ( 1999 ) argues that a high grade of absorbent capacity extends the assimilation to all sorts of applied, cardinal signifier of cognition and through all manners of vehicles like PhD pupils, scientific staff, proficient devices etc..

Cohen and Levinthal themselves argue that whilst ain R & A ; D produces non merely new cognition in the sense of inventions but contributes besides to the absorbent capacity of the house it does so in portion by increasing the accomplishments of the employees who have been involved in the R & A ; D procedure. These stocks of accomplishments or of anterior cognition find the ability to absorb and utilise external cognition ( Cohen and Levinthal, 1990 ) . Prior related cognition includes cardinal accomplishments or cognition of the recent technological and managerial developments in a given field ( Cohen and Levinthal 1990 ; Lane and Lubatkin 1998 ) and up-to-date information on cognition spheres ( Szulanski 1996, 2003 ) . This implies there is an of import function to be played for single accomplishments and acquiring those accomplishments to the right people in the right places.

It can nevertheless non be denied that R & A ; D plays an of import function in geting absorbent capacity which can be a fringe benefit for successful unfastened invention. However, many houses have low R & A ; D strength, either due to size ( e.g. little concerns ) or industry features ( low tech ) . Are they prosecuting “ external invention, ” ” unfastened invention, ” or ( as normally assumed ) “ no invention ” schemes? ( West, J and Gallagher, S. 2006 ) . Geting adequate absorbent capacity through R & A ; D hence seems to be a challenge for SMEs.

Propisition 1:

SMEs implement small R & A ; D initiatives which hinders them in geting sufficient absorbent capacity.

Human resources and single accomplishments & A ; cognition

Absorbent capacity is besides determined by factors such as employees ‘ abilities and the ability to pass on and portion cognition. Therefore, absorbent capacity can include facets within the cognition base of the house other than R & A ; D. Human resources provide a strong capacity to larn, as in for case, accomplishments and preparation ( Giuliani and Bell 2005 ) ; and ”qualified human resources are indispensable in supervising the development of external cognition and in measuring its relevancy, and for the integration of these engineerings into productive activities ” ( Narula 2004 ) . Duty for this facet of the house lies in the Human Resources ( HR ) section. Human resources ( HR ) as a section has been defined as ; “ The section or support systems responsible for forces sourcing and hiring, applicant trailing, accomplishments development and trailing, benefits disposal and conformity with associated authorities ordinances ” ( entrepreneur.com ) . What it comes down to for this research is guaranting that the right accomplishments and cognition are available at the right topographic point in the company at the right minute in clip.

In this subdivision the research distinguishes between the function of HR and the function of “ gatekeepers ” .

The importance of HR

For invention to work, the work force needs to be willing every bit good as able to follow alterations if invention is to decently win ( Leonard-Barton, 1988 ; Miettinen, 2006 ; Orlikowski and Scott, 2008 ) . In pattern houses who apply a high grade of HR patterns are in a better place to introduce ( Vinding, 2000 ) . The consequence is besides in line with Laursen and Foss ( 2000 ) , who finds that the application of HR patterns is more effectual in act uponing the advanced public presentation when these patterns are applied together instead than entirely. Hence, HR patterns are complementary to one another.

Besides being willing to accept and implement alterations, Reagans and McEvily ( 2003 ) back up the construct of cognition accretion by demoing that people absorb knowledge more easy when they already have some common cognition in footings of expertness, preparation or back land features. This is farther proven by Cohen and Levinthal ( 1990 ) who province that prior related cognition gives the frame of mention to understand new cognition. Even though in this they refer to prior cognition from R & A ; D undertakings, the same is true for the cognition and experience that employees possess. HR plays a cardinal function in fiting the different accomplishments and experienced employees together.

To understand how an person ‘s accomplishments and cognition have an consequence on absorbent capacity, which is largely considered on the firm-level, this research looks at Cohen and Levinthal. Although they define absorbent capacity as an organisation concept, Cohen and Levinthal ( 1990 ) besides suggest that absorbent capacity exists on the single degree. As Cohen and Levinthal ( 1990 ) point out, single degree absorbent capacity is an of import ancestor to organisation degree absorbent capacity. Even stronger, the latter is supervenient on the former in the sense that there is no organisation degree absorbent capacity without single degree absorbent capacity. Therefore, the larning behavior of persons and the picks they make with regard preparation, instruction, cognition sharing, etc. , are of import foundations of organisation degree absorbent capacity.

The polar function that HR plays in fiting up single accomplishments and experience can non be underestimated. In SMEs the HR section frequently plays a strictly administrative function, guaranting and look intoing paysheet etc. In pattern this means that there is normally no official HR section, nevertheless there are the basic undertakings that need to be performed. This leads to the undermentioned proposition:

Proposition 2:

HR sections or the people that fullfill the basic HR undertakings in SMEs do non hold the capacity to successfully increase the absorbent capacity in the house.

The importance of gatekeepers

As stated before, in the work of Cohen and Levinthal R & A ; D budgets determines the absorbent capacity by increasing the house ‘s stock of cognition. But they are besides cognizant of the fact that absorbent capacity is dependent on persons working in the administration. Particularly people located at the interface of either the house or its environment or at the interface between fractional monetary units within the house. These gatekeepers are indispensable and Tushman and Katz ( 1980 ) besides emphasise that gatekeepers are able to cut down the mismatch in linguistic communication and cognitive orientation among two systems and are peculiarly of import in development undertakings. Inside the house an of import undertaking for the gatekeeper is to convey the information to the remainder of the administration and if these gatekeepers are in a place of a high degree of expertness the transmittal procedure will go easier. The higher educated the gatekeeper, the more expeditiously the transportation of cognition in general. This is in line with Mangematin et Al. ( 1999 ) . They argue that particularly high-educated employees will of course, by their day-to-day undertaking, increase the stock of cognition in the administration. They will further promote dealingss with other persons with similar competences outside the house, therefore facilitate entree to external webs of cognition, particularly in the instance of using scientific cognition ( Rothwell and Dodgson 1991 ) . This is particularly true if the high-educated worker is in a direction place.

Carter ( 1989 ) argues that higher educated employees are the chief subscribers of know-how trading due to high degree of cognition embodied in these people. This statement in farther supported by Guellec ( 1996 ) who emphasise skilled labor to be in a better place to bring forth new cognition because they master province of the art cognition and therefore are better to pull off new engineering. Canto ( 1999 ) finds that intangible resource – divided into human and commercial issues is the chief determiner of transporting out R & A ; D compared to fiscal and physical resources. Florida ( 1995 ) generalised the importance of the issue by reasoning that we are come ining into a new age of cognition creative activity and uninterrupted acquisition where the chief beginning of value and economic growing is the human head alternatively of the house. Harmonizing to Florida ( 1995 ) the fight of the house is determined by a alone combination of single competences as a consequence of acquired accomplishments, instruction, making and preparation.

Naturally an organisation ‘s absorbent capacity is non resident in any individual person, but depends on the links across a mosaic of single capablenesss ( Cohen and Levinthal, 1990 ) . Absorbent capacity requires porous boundaries, scanning loosely for new cognition, and identifying and utilizing those employees who serve as gatekeepers and boundary wrenchs ( Volberda, 1996 ) . Management capablenesss may synthesise and use current and acquired cognition and may be influenced and limited by the knowledges and dominant logics of directors. In line with Adner and Helfat ( 2003 ) , a dynamic managerial capableness refers to the capacity of directors to make, widen or modify the cognition resource base of an organisation. Examples of these managerial capablenesss and accomplishments are the construction of communicating, the character and distribution of expertness, gate-keeping or boundary-spanning functions, cross-functional interfaces and occupation rotary motion. In this respect the director clearly takes on the function as gatekeeper. We need more research on the comparative consequence of these direction accomplishments and capablenesss on absorbent capacity ( Volberda 2009 ) .

Furthermore, there are of import managerial capablenesss that complement one another. For case, Jansen et Al. ( 2005 ) studied the separate and joint impact of different combinatory capablenesss: coordination, systems and socialisation capablenesss and their differential consequence on absorbent capacities. Furthermore, assorted formal and informal managerial inducements may otherwise act upon absorbent capacity and cognition sharing. Besides managerial capablenesss and inducements, house absorbent capacity will be strongly influenced by cognitive procedures on the managerial degree and bing dominant logics of direction squads ( Mom, Van den Bosch and Volberda, 2007 ) .

Bibliometric analysis by Volberda ( 2009 ) shows that managerial ancestors are among the most of import for surveies on absorbent capacity. These typically address managerial actions, dominant logic, and human resource mechanisms.

In decision gatekeepers play a polar function in communicating and cognition transportation within the company and on the inter-company degree. The higher educated the gatekeeper is, the better. Often the director will take on the function as gate-keeper, particularly in a SME it is expected that the function of the director, every bit good as the board of managers will be larger, merely because of the size of the company. With an increased influence for the director, the consequence on absorbent capacity within the house is besides increased.

Proposition 3:

Absorbent capacity is reduced, the larger the influence of the director is on the house.

Company construction

The concluding facet this research will look at in finding the sum of absorbent capacity in a house is the company construction. The absorbent capacity of a house is determined by its expertness in stimulating and forming cognition sharing ( Schmidt 2005 ; Van Den Bosch, Volbeerda, and De Boer 1999 ) ; this is related to the trouble for the organisation as a whole to excite and form the transportation of cognition across sections, maps, and persons. Therefore, the organisational construction and cross-functional communicating have been found to better absorbent capacity if they lead to improved cognition sharing among sections and persons within a house ( Daghfous 2004 ; Lane and Lubatkin 1998 ; Van Den Bosch et Al. 1999 ) .

This is confirmed even in the early research on the topic by Cohen and Levinthal ( 1990 ) that besides determine that distinguishable organisational mechanism can act upon the degree of absorbent capacity, such as the transportation of cognition across and within units, the construction of communicating between the external environment and the house ( i.e. the centralisation of the interface map ) , a wide and active web of internal and external relationships, and cross-function interfaces ( Van den Bosch, Volberda and De Boer, 1999 ) . Volberda et Al ( 2009 ) point out that absorbent capacity refers non merely to the acquisition or assimilation of information by an organisation, but besides to the organisation ‘s ability to work it. Therefore, an organisation ‘s AC does non merely depend on the organisation ‘s direct interface with the external environment. It besides depends on transportations of cognition across and within fractional monetary units and the capacity for using that cognition.

Here the function of the director and managerial knowledge surfaces one time once more. Theory on managerial knowledge suggests that directors perceive things through their ain cognitive lenses. Therefore, directors can be considered as “ cognizers ” ( Calori, Johnson, and Sarnin, 1994 ) , who cut down the complexness they face by developing mental maps that result in a “ dominant direction logic ” ( Prahalad and Bettis, 1986 ; Bettis and Prahalad, 1995 ) . This dominant logic evolves over clip, straight act uponing the organisational signifier ( Dijksterhuis, Van den Bosch, and Volberda, 1999 ) and indirectly the degree of absorbent capacity ( Van den Bosch et Al, 1999 ) . For illustration, directors using a classical direction logic ( Dijksterhuis et al. , 1999: 572 ; Volberda, 1998 ) favour traditional functional organizational signifiers and make non see the environment as a beginning of valuable cognition to be absorbed ( Van den Bosch et al. , 1999 ) . In such a classical direction logic, directors portray organisations as tools designed to accomplish preset terminals and ignore or minimise the disturbances and chances posed by connexions to a wider environment ( Scott, 1987 ) . Therefore, these directors will earnestly restrict the degree of absorbent capacity of the house. Lenox and King ( 2004 ) show that directors can nevertheless straight affect a house ‘s absorbent capacity for a new pattern by supplying information to possible adoptive parents in the organisation. The effectivity of these managerial actions is contingent on the grade to which other beginnings of information are available to persons. Previous adoptive parents and past events seem to stifle the consequence of cardinal information, while related experiences seem to magnify it.

Minbaeva et Al. ( 2003 ) stress the importance of persons ‘ ability ( instruction and accomplishments ) every bit good

their motive to absorb external cognition. As directors continuously develop theories about the

universe around them and implant them in their dominant logic ( Sanchez, 2001 ) , steadfast AC will be strongly

influenced by cognitive procedures on the managerial degree. This is consistent with Van lair Bosch and

Van Wijk ‘s ( 2001 ) supplication to acknowledge the strong consequence directors can hold on knowledge-related procedures in organisations. Van den Bosch, Volberda, and De Boer ( 1999 ) stress that the features of a house ‘s absorbent capacity relate to the nature of the cognition in its environment. They support Cohen and Levinthal ‘s impression ( 1990 ) that: “ Absorbent capacity is more likely to be developed and maintained as a by-product of everyday activity when the cognition sphere that the house wishes to work is closely related to its current cognition base ” . However, they show that cognition embedded in the organisational signifier ( Grant, 1996 ) every bit good as the house ‘s combinatory capablenesss ( Kogut and Zander, 1992 ) influence a house ‘s absorbent capacity. Not lone restrictions in a house ‘s current cognition base, but besides the rigidness of organisation signifiers and the combinatory capablenesss to synthesise and use current and acquired cognition may bring forth inactiveness in accommodating absorbent capacity. Van Wijk, Van den Bosch, and Volberda ( 2003 ) and Malhotra, Gosain, and El Sawy ( 2005 ) show that interorganizational webs and supply ironss can be honoring for houses to derive entree to knowledge, to ease acquisition procedures, and to further cognition creative activity. Furthermore, from an internal web position, Andersen and Foss ( 2005 ) find that the development of strategic chances is increased by internal communicating between concern units, set uping clearly the relevancy of cognition transportation and AC within multi-unit houses. Jansen, Van den Bosch, and Volberda ( 2005 ) provide grounds of the distinguishable effects of organisational ancestors on the constituents of absorbent capacity. They show in an empirical survey within a multi-unit house that coordination capablenesss, such as “ cross-functional interfaces, engagement in decision-making, and occupation rotary motion ” ( 2005: 999 ) enhance possible absorbent capacity.

A house ‘s cognition base can non be separated from how it is presently organized ( Grant, 1996b ) . An organisation signifier can be viewed as a construction that carries out multiple knowledge-related undertakings, such as evaluating, absorbing, incorporating, utilizing, and edifice cognition ( Loasby, 1976 ) . Given this overall penetration, assorted multi-unit organisation signifiers otherwise influence the degree and type of absorbent capacity ( Van den Bosch et al. , 1999 ) . Issues of internal informal webs are besides of import for the designation and assimilation of new cognition. Dhanaraj et Al. ( 2004 ) place the importance of societal embeddedness in reassigning tacit and expressed cognition. Thus webs of persons influence what cognition is shared or assimilated. For case, absorbent capacity can be transferred through engaging new forces or corporate acquisitions. Unit of measurement construction, house size and informal webs are the beginning of heterogeneousness of absorbent capacity. The deficiency of research sing intra-organizational ancestors is surprising, particularly since Cohen and Levinthal ( 1990 ) emphasized the importance of organisational mechanisms and suggested sing what facets of absorbent capacity are clearly organisational. Even when organisational ancestors have been considered ( Lane et al. , 2001 ) , their relationships with different dimensions of absorbent capacity have non been tested through empirical observation.

Cohen and Levinthal ( 1990 ) articulate that non merely the gatekeeper ‘s absorbent capacity affairs, but besides that the group as a whole must hold some degree of relevant background cognition.

Proposition 4:

SMEs ‘ traditionally short lines of communicating better communicating and therefore improves absorbent capacity within the house.

Proposition 5:

The higher the sum of highly-educated forces that are involved in invention and research at a house, the higher the absorbent capacity.

Chapter 3, Research Method:

Puting and participants

This research is conducted in the Dutch states of “ Noord-Brabant, Utrecht, Limburg and Gelderland ” . All the companies that have been approached for this research are SMEs in the IT sector that have SBI codification 6201 and are therefore active in package research, development and gross revenues.

This research is based on eight semi structured interviews with either the Chief runing officer or main operational officer within the company. As some of the inquiries are besides targeted to the HR activities of the house, either the individual responsible for HR or forces was present or had answered inquiries in progress. In one case a call-back was planned after the interview itself. Postpone 1 shows the representative that was present at the clip of the interview. “ Ten ” means that representative was present whereas “ – ” means he or she was non. “ S ” means that this place was filled by the same individual that was already present. In all cases this was the CEO taking on other undertakings. In all cases, and as requested, in all cases the interviewee was responsible for R & A ; D activities.

Table 1 participants and place within the company

CEO nowadays?

COO nowadays?

HR rep. Present?

Responsible for R & A ; D?

Company A

–

Ten

-*

Ten

Company B

Ten

–

Second

Ten

Company C

Ten

Second

Ten

Ten

Company D

Ten

Second

Ten

Ten

Company Tocopherol

–

Ten

Ten

Ten

Company F

–

Ten

Ten

Ten

Company G

Ten

–

Ten

Ten

Company H

–

Ten

Ten

Ten

Semi-structured interview

Absorbent capacity is a hard construct to mensurate, among others, Becker and Peters ( 2000 ) province: “ The empirical measuring of absorbent capacities of houses is hard. ” This due to the slightly immaterial nature of the construct taking to descriptions as presented by Mowery and Oxley ( 1995 ) , who define absorbent capacity as a set of accomplishments needed to cover with silent cognition. A “ fluffy ” construct like this means that there are practically no administrations or persons that can give a straightforward indicant of their step of absorbent capacity. This has resulted in the usage of placeholders to develop some kind of empirical construct to mensurate absorbent capacity in studies.

A figure of placeholders have been used to capture absorbent capacity in a figure of research Fieldss. In the field of invention and cooperation behavior of houses popular placeholders have been R & A ; D budgets, -stocks, and -intensities ( Belderbos et al. , 2004 ; Cassiman and Veugelers, 2002 ; Oltra and Flor, 2003 ; Stock et al. , 2001 ) . Other placeholders that are used in different Fieldss but chiefly in the field of concern disposal include organisational construction and patterns, like incentive systems and human resource and cognition direction, ( Lenox and King, 2004 ; Van Den Bosch et al. , 1999 ; Vinding, 2000 ) and “ production line public presentation in footings of labour productiveness and conformity quality ” ( Mukherjee et al. , 2000 ) . Furthermore, incursion and version of engineerings within the house can be used to measure absorbent capacity ( Petroni and Panciroli 2002 ) .

This trouble in mensurating absorbent capacity has besides resulted in troubles with respects to comparing research consequences every bit good as small research “ on the procedure by which absorbent capacity is developed ” ( Lane et al. , 2002 ) . This research deficit on the determiners of absorbent capacity was stressed non merely by Lane et Al. ( 2002 ) , who reviewed about 180 documents mentioning Cohen and Levinthal ( 1998,1990 ) , but besides by Veugelers ( 1997 ) . She writes that “ More work is needed to place specific house features bring forthing this absorbent capacity ” ( p.314 ) . Mahnke et Al. ( 2005 ) besides province that

there is a deficiency of empirical literature on how a house can increase its absorbent capacity.

The qualitative interview is used in qualitative research of all sorts, whether rationalist, interpretative or critical. It is used in instance surveies, in action research, in grounded theory surveies, and in descriptive anthropologies ( Hesse-Biber & A ; Levy, 2006 ; Klein & A ; Myers, 1999 ; Myers, 1997, 1999 ; Northcutt & A ; McCoy, 2004 ) . The qualitative interview permits us to see that which is non normally on position examine that which is looked at, but rarely seen ( Rubin & A ; Rubin, 2005 ) . The trouble in mensurating absorbent capacity in studies agencies that for this explorative research the interview methodological analysis is a valid method for the field research.

Fontana and Frey ( 2000 ) separate a assorted sum of types of qualitative interviews, three of these are:

Structured interview. In a structured interview there is a complete book that is prepared beforehand. There is no room for improvisation. These types of interviews are frequently used in studies where the interviews are non needfully conducted by the research worker.

Unstructured or semi-structured interview. In an unstructured or semi-structured interview there is an uncomplete book. The research worker may hold prepared some inquiries beforehand, but there is a demand for improvisation. The interviewer is the research worker or is one of a squad.

Group interview. In a group interview two or more people are interviewed at one time by one or more interviewers. This type of interview can be structured or unstructured.

This research will do usage of the semi-structured interview, some inquiries are prepared beforehand, but there is room for improvisation. See attachment # # # # for the prepared inquiries.

There are nevertheless a figure of jobs with utilizing interviews as a tool for qualitative research as distinguished by Myers and Newman ( 2006 ) .

Artificiality of the interview – With qualitative interviews it is of import to observe that an unreal state of affairs is created where a comparative alien is asked to reply speculative inquiries in a limited sum of clip.

Lack of trust – When person who is unknown to the interviewee is inquiring personal or sensitive inquiries trust-issues may originate. This can ensue in the interviewee non unwraping information he or she sees as “ delicate ” . This can ensue in uncomplete or false consequences.

Lack of clip – Interviews are usually undertaken within a set time-frame. This can hold two negative results, foremost of all that the interviewee does non acquire to voice his or her strong sentiments on comparative issues. Second the exact antonym may be the instance, sentiments that are non held in high respect rhenium voiced with urgency due to the clip force per unit area. Either manner this can hold the consequence of garnering uncomplete or false informations.

Degree of entry – Entry degree for the interviewer within the house is perfectly critical ( Buchanan, Boddy, & A ; McCalman, 1988 ) . For illustration, when the interviewer has a low entry degree within the house, there is the possibility that the research worker will happen it difficult to interview upper direction.

Elite bias – Elite prejudice occurs when an interviewer merely interviews high ranking directors or “ stars ” ( Miles and Huberman, 1994 ) within the house. This may ensue in the interviewer neglecting to acquire a clear image of the broader state of affairs. Elite bias concerns overweighting informations from articulate, intelligent, normally high-status sources and, conversely, under-representing informations from intractable, less articulate, lower-status 1s ( Heiskanen & A ; Newman, 1997 ) .

Hawthorne effects – The interviewer is non unseeable, even though he or she is supposed to be a impersonal party, the interviewer can alter the state of affairs with his or her presence ( Fontana & A ; Frey, 2000 ) .

Constructing cognition – Interviewers are actively building cognition ( Fontana & A ; Frey, 2000 ) . In answer to an interviewer, the interviewee will believe about topics that they have non thought about earlier. The interviewee will wish to look good informed and rational and may build cognition to reflect this.

Ambiguity of linguistic communication – Fontana and Frey ( 2000 ) say that ”Asking inquiries and acquiring replies is a much harder undertaking that it may look at foremost. The spoken or written word has ever a residue of ambiguity, no affair how carefully we word the inquiries or how carefully we report or code the replies ” ( Fontana & A ; Frey, 2000 ) .

Interviews can travel incorrect – If the interviewer offends or angers the interviewee, the interviewee may call off the interview wholly ( Hermanns, 2004 ) .

Measuring absorbent capacity

As described, mensurating absorbent capacity proves to be a hard, if non impossible, challenge. With a construct that is every bit untouchable as absorbent capacity this is a common job. To besiege this job, alternatively of mensurating the absorbent capacity, the eight companies that will be approached for this research will be put in an order based on absorbent capacity. From highest to lowest. This order can be used to make a synergism with the other research informations as it emerges.

To acquire an thought of the sum of absorbent capacity, the research will concentrate on the three facets of absorbent capacity:

Observation

Understanding

Using

Both understanding and using can be asked in a direct inquiry. Observation provides a bigger challenge. To acquire an thought on how good a house observes their environment with respects to invention, the inquiry that is of involvement is how many developments the house ‘s cardinal directors ( COO/CEO ) see within the market.

Proposition 1:

SMEs implement small R & A ; D initiatives which hinders them in geting sufficient absorbent capacity.

The R & A ; D enterprises can be merely asked per company. Of involvement are the figure of R & A ; D initiatives that are being undertaken each twelvemonth, the per centum of forces that are actively involved in R & A ; D and the per centum of turnover that is spent on R & A ; D each twelvemonth. Last the basic inquiry that can be asked is, how of import is R & A ; D for the house?

With these consequences, the companies will be put in order and compared with the consequences from mensurating absorbent capacity.

Proposition 2:

HR sections or the people that fulfil the basic HR undertakings in SMEs do non hold the capacity to successfully increase the absorbent capacity in the house.

The proposition will be tested by a short interview with either the HR director or whoever fulfils the HR undertakings within the company. Important inquiries are calculating out if there is a specific HR budget for preparation and if so, what per centum of turnover is spent on it. It is of import to acquire a general thought of the HR environment within the house and making an order within the companies and comparing this to the consequences from mensurating absorbent capacity.

Proposition 3:

Absorbent capacity is reduced, the larger the influence of the director is on the house.

Measuring the influence of the director on the house is hard. Besides looking at the organizational construction this research will inquire inquiries about the propinquity of the director to the invention procedure and the process-control the director has built into the administration. Furthermore personal penchants of the directors will be looked at, if these personal penchants have found their manner onto the work floor, this is an indicant of an increased influence of the director on the house.

Proposition 4:

SMEs ‘ traditionally short lines of communicating better communicating and therefore improves absorbent capacity within the house.

For this proposition taking a expression at the organizational construction and internal procedures is of import. Is there an unfastened door policy and how seeable and involved is the director on the work floor?

Proposition 5:

The higher the sum of highly-educated forces that are involved in invention and research at a house, the higher the absorbent capacity.

To be able to do a comparing this research will seek to happen the per centum of forces involved with R & A ; D that are extremely educated and compare this per centum to other sections within the house.

Analysis

All stuff was given construction and summarized by building a information matrix that included 176 squares. Each square summarized an reply to a inquiry utilizing sentence concentration ( Kvale, 1989 ) . The entire informations matrix provides an overview of all replies to all the inquiries, where N = 22. This information matrix was so summarized farther by associating them to the five propositions. Finally, adding the order by which the companies perform with respects to absorbent capacity and correlating this with the sum-ups from the information matrix, this consequences in the decisions of this research.

Chapter 4 ; consequences

Literature

Ahuja, G. ( 2000 ) . “ The Duality of Collaboration: Incentives and Opportunities in the Formation of Interfirm Linkages. ” Strategic Management Journal 21: 317-343.

Arora, A. and A. Gambardella ( 1990 ) . “ Complementarity and External Linkages: The Schemes of the Large Firms in Biotechnology. ” Journal of Industrial Economics 38: 361-379.

Barney, J. B. ( 1991 ) . ‘Firm resources and sustained competitory advantage ‘ . Journal of Management,

17, 99-120.

Belderbos, R. , M.A. Carree, B. Diederen, B. Lokshin and R. Veugelers ( 2004 ) , Heterogeneity in R & A ; D cooperation schemes, International Journal of Industrial Organization 22 ( 8-9 ) , 1237-1263.

Canto, J. , Gonzalez, I. ( 1999 ) . “ A Resource-based Analysis of the Factors Determining a FirmA?s R & A ; D Activities. ” Research Policy 28: 891-905.

Cargill, C. , Bolin, S. , Standardization: a neglecting paradigm, Standards and Public Policy Conference, Chicago, IL, 2004.

Carter, A. P. ( 1989 ) . “ Knowhow Trading as Economic Exchange. ” Research Policy 18: 1-9.

Cassiman, B. and R. Veugelers ( 2002 ) , R & A ; D Cooperation and spillovers: Some empirical grounds from Belgium, American Economic Review 44 ( 3 ) , 1169-1184.

Chandler, A.D. , 1990, Scale and Scope, First Harvard University Press, Boston, 1990.

Chesbrough, H.W. , Open Innovation: The new jussive mood for making and gaining from engineering, Harvard University Press, Boston, 2003.

Chesbrough, H.W. , Open Innovation, Harvard University Press, Boston 2003a.

Cohen, W. M. , and Levinthal, D. A. 1989. Invention and acquisition: The two faces of R & A ; D. The Economic Journal 99 ( September ) : 569-596.

Cohen, W. M. , and Levinthal, D. A. 1990. Absorbent capacity: A new position of acquisition and invention. Administrative Science Quarterly 35 ( 1 ) : 128-152.

Cohen, W.M. , Levinthal, D.A. , 1994. Fortune favors the prepared house. Management Science 40, 227-251.

Conner, K.R. 1991. A Historical Comparison of the Resource-Based Theory and Five Schools of Thought Within Industrial Organization Economicss: Do We Have a New Theory of the Firm? , Journal of Management ( 17:1 ) , pp. 121-154.

Daghfous, A. 2004. Absorbent capacity and the execution of knowledgeintensive best patterns. SAM Advanced Management Journal 69 ( 2 ) : 21-27.

Fagerberg, J. , Mowery, D. , & A ; Nelson, R. ( 2004 ) . The Oxford Handbook of Innovation. Oxford University Press.

Florida, R. ( 1995 ) . “ Toward the Learning Region. ” Futures 27 ( 5 ) : 527-536.

Gambardella, A. ( 1992 ) . “ Competitive Advantages from In-house Scientific research: The US Pharmaceutical industry in the eightiess. ” Research Policy 21: 391-401.

Giuliani, E. , and Bell, M. 2005. The micro-determinants of meso degree acquisition and invention: Evidence from a Chilean vino bunch. Research Policy 34 ( 1 ) : 47-68.

Gentile-Ludecke, Simona and Axele Giroud 2009. Does the E learn from the West? How Polish automotive providers learn from western MNEs, Journal of East-West Business, 15 ( 3 ) , 271-294.

Grant, R. M. 1996. Toward a knowledge-based theory of the house. Strategic Management Journal 17 ( Winter Special Issue ) : 109-122.

Guellec, D. ( 1996 ) . “ Knowledge, Skills and Growth: Some Economic Issues. ” STI Review 18: 17-38.

Hauschildt, J. , & A ; Salomo, S. ( 2011 ) . Innovationsmanagement. Muenchen: Verlag Franz Vahlen GmbH.

Henderson, R. and I. Cuckburn ( 1996 ) . “ Scale, Scope and Spillovers: The Determinants of

Research Productivity in Drug Discovery. ” Rand Journal Economics 27 ( 32-59 ) .

Kaplan, J. , Startup: A Silicon Valley Adventure, Penguin, New York 1996.

Kedia, B.L. , R.S. Bhagat. 1988. Cultural restraints on transportation of engineering across states:

Deductions for research in international and comparative advantage. Academy of Management

Review. 13 559-571.

Kline, S. , & A ; Rosenberg, N. ( 1986 ) . The Positive Sum Strategy. Washington: Washington National Academy Press.

Kvale, S. ( Ed. ) ( 1989 ) . Issues of cogency in qualitative research. Lund, Sweden: Studentlitteratur.

Lane, P. J. , and Lubatkin, M. 1998. Relative absorbent capacity and interorganisational acquisition. Strategic Management Journal 19 ( 5 ) : 461-477.

Laursen, K. ( 2000b ) . “ Knowledge Strategies, Firm Types, and Complementarity in Humanresource Practices. ” LINK Working Paper.

Lenox, M. and A. King ( 2004 ) , Prospects for developing absorbent capacity through internal information provision. , Strategic Management Journal 25 ( 4 ) , 331-345.

Leonard-Barton, D. , 1988. Execution as common version of engineering and organisation. Research Policy 17, 251-267.

Lichtenthaler, U. , Lichtenthaler, E. , 2009. A capability-based model for unfastened invention: complementing absorbent capacity. Journal of Management Studies 46, 1315-1338.

Mangematin, V. , L. Nesta ( 1999 ) . “ What Kind of cognition can a Firm Absorb? ” International Journal of Technology Management 18 ( 3/4 ) : 149-172.

Miettinen, R. , 2006. The beginnings of freshness: a cultural and systemic position of distributed creativeness. Creativity and Innovation Management 15, 173-181.

Myers, S. , & A ; Marquis, D. ( 1969 ) . Successful Industrial Innovation: a Study of Factors Underlying Innovation in Selected Firms. National Science Foundation.

Nakamura, M. , Vertinsky, I. and Zietsma, C. , Does Culture Matter in Inter-Firm Cooperation? Research Consortia in Japan and the USA. Managerial and Decision Economics, 18, 2, 153 – 175, 1997.

Narula, R. 2004. Understanding absorbent capacities in an invention systems context: Consequences for economic growing. In MERIT-infonomics Research Memorandum Series 2004-003, Maastricht Economic Research Institute on Innovation and Technology.

Oltra, M.J. and M. Flor ( 2003 ) , The Impact of Technological Opportunities and Innovative Capabilities on Firms ‘ Output Innovation. , Creativity & A ; Innovation Management 12 ( 3 ) , 137-144.

Orlikowski, W.J. , Scott, S.V. , 2008. Sociomateriality: disputing the separation of engineering, work and organisation. Academy of Management Annals 2, 433-474.

Penrose, E. T. ( 1959 ) . The Theory of the Growth of the Firm. New York: John Wiley.

Petroni, A. , and Panciroli, B. 2002. Invention as a determiner of providers ‘ functions and public presentations: An empirical survey in the nutrient machinery industry. European Journal of Purchasing & A ; Supply Management 8 ( 3 ) : 135-149.

Ronald reagans, R. , B. McEvily. 2003. Network construction and cognition transportation: The effects of coherence and scope. Administrative Science Quarterly. 48 240-267.

Roth, M. , SMEs in The Netherlands, Deutsche Bank Research, Frankfurth am Main Germany, 2011.

Rothwell, R. and M. Dodgson ( 1991 ) . “ External Linkages and Innovation in Small and Medium-sized Enterprises. ” R & A ; D Management 21: 125-137.

Santoro, M.D. , Chakrabarti, A.K. , Corporate strategic aims for set uping relationships with university research centres. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 48, 2, 157-163, 2001.

Master Thesis, Inside-out unfastened invention in SMEs: Practices, motivations and direction challenges. Ingo Scheunemann April 2011

Schmidt, T. 2005. What determines absorbent capacity? Paper presented at the DRUID Tenth Anniversary Summer Conference 2005, Copenhagen, June 27-29.

Simona Gentile-Ludecke & A ; Axele Giroud ( 2009 ) : Does the East Learn from the West? How Polish Automotive Suppliers Learn from Western MNEs, Journal of East-West Business, 15:3-4, 271-294.

Skarzynski, P. , & A ; Gibson, R. ( 2008 ) . Invention to the Core: A Blueprint for Transforming the Way Your Company Innovates. Boston: Harvard Business Press.

Spender, J. C. 1996. Making knowledge the footing of a dynamic theory of the house. Strategic Management Journal 17 ( Winter Special Issue ) : 45-62.

Stock, G.N. , N.P. Greis and W.A. Fischer ( 2001 ) , Absorptive capacity and new merchandise development. , Journal of High Technology Management Research 12 ( 1 ) , 77-91.

Squire, B. , Cousins, P. D. , and Brown, S. 2008. Cooperation and cognition transportation within buyer-supplier relationships: The chairing belongingss of trust, relationship continuance and supplier public presentation. British Journal of Management.

Szulanski, G. 1996. Researching internal stickiness: Hindrances to the transportation of best pattern within the house. Strategic Management Journal 17 ( Winter Special Issue ) : 27-43.

Tushman, M. , R. Katz ( 1980 ) . “ External Cummunication and Project Performance: An Investigation into the Role of Gatekeepers. ” Management Science 26 ( 1 ) : 1071-1085.

Van Den Bosch, F. A. J. , Volberda, H. W. , and De Boer, M. 1999. Coevolution of house absorbent capacity and cognition environment: Organizational signifiers and combinatory capablenesss. Organization Science 10 ( 5 ) : 551-568.

Van Den Bosch, F.A.J. , R. Van Wijk and H.W. Volberda ( 2003 ) , Absorbent Capacity: Ancestors, Models, and Outcomes. , Blackwell Handbook of Organi